From: Stephen Berman <stephen.berman@gmx.net>
To: Howard Melman <hmelman@gmail.com>
Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>, 48317@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#48317: 27.1; text-property-search-forward moves point to end when not found
Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 01:18:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fsys7tb8.fsf@rub.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9D0AA29D-DE30-43D7-8109-84636A3D36F0@gmail.com> (Howard Melman's message of "Tue, 11 May 2021 15:28:48 -0400")
On Tue, 11 May 2021 15:28:48 -0400 Howard Melman <hmelman@gmail.com> wrote:
> To me, this function behaves unexpectedly different in these cases
> (say in a font-locked elisp buffer just before the last defun):
>
> ;; a region with property face is found,
> ;; point is moved to the end of it
> (text-property-search-forward 'face)
>
> ;; a region with property unused is not found,
> ;; point is unmoved
> (text-property-search-forward 'unused)
>
> ;; a region with the specfied face is found,
> ;; point is moved to the beginning of it
> (text-property-search-forward 'face 'font-lock-function-name-face)
>
> ;; a region with the specfied face is not found,
> ;; point is moved to eob
> (text-property-search-forward 'face 'unused)
>
> ;; a region with the specfied property is not found,
> ;; point is moved to eob
> (text-property-search-forward 'unused-prop 'unused-value)
>
> The first two behave perfectly reasonably to me. And as the manual
> suggests, behaves the same as search-forward.
>
> The 3rd does as well, of course.
>
> I'd expect both the 4th and the 5th to behave the same as the 2nd but
> they move point to eob.
>
> And while I now mostly understand (but don't fully grok) the logic,
> it's baffling to me that to make the last three behave like the first
> two I should set PREDICATE to t (and btw doing so changes the behavior
> of the 3rd to leave point at the end of the match instead of the
> beginning, which seems odd).
It's behaving as documented: without t, the search found some other
value of 'face (possibly nil) not equal to 'font-lock-function-name-face
and moved to the end of the thus propertized text, as documented. You
should see this in the return value (shown as a message), which could be
something like this: #s(prop-match 37 41 nil)
> The difference between the 3rd and 4th isn't some subtle difference
> between using equal and eq or something, it's that the specified value
> of the face is not found as it was using the default predicate in the
> 3rd case.
No, in the third case the search stopped before the specified value was
found.
> And particularly in the 5th, the choice of predicate to
> evaluate 'unused-value shouldn't come into play because 'unused-prop
> itself isn't found.
>
> And the documentation describing PREDICATE nil didn't help me at all.
> In the manual it says for nil:
>
> (which means “not equal”)
>
> which sounds to me as if it is using the function not.
>
> And in your updated docstring as:
>
> a value will match if is not `equal' to VALUE
>
> which really throws me because the 3rd case above works and it's
> not "not `equal'" to font-lock-function-name-face!
Again, this is correct: the found value (possibly nil, as illustrated
above) is not equal to 'font-lock-function-name-face.
> Does this explain my confusion?
>
> I interpret all of these:
>
> (search-forward "defun")
> (text-property-search-forward 'face)
> (text-property-search-forward 'face 'font-lock-function-name-face)
>
> to mean search for the thing I specified, whether that's a string, a
> specific property with any value or a specific property with a
> specific value. But somehow the last one is different. And try as I
> might now to write how it's being interpreted I'm unable to. Search
> for the property face but only if it is font-lock-function-name-face
> or if it isn't...?
In light of the above explanations, is it clearer now?
Steve Berman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-11 23:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-09 16:41 bug#48317: 27.1; text-property-search-forward moves point to end when not found Howard Melman
2021-05-09 17:07 ` Eli Zaretskii
[not found] ` <616F7732-ED83-40F0-A460-9298608EAD91@gmail.com>
2021-05-09 17:48 ` Eli Zaretskii
[not found] ` <8877DDB9-7D2B-4DCC-8374-EB8391134EAC@gmail.com>
2021-05-09 18:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-05-09 19:48 ` Howard Melman
2021-05-10 9:05 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-05-10 13:06 ` Howard Melman
2021-05-11 12:32 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-05-11 12:48 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-05-11 13:14 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-05-11 14:20 ` Howard Melman
2021-05-11 16:36 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-05-11 19:28 ` Howard Melman
2021-05-11 23:18 ` Stephen Berman [this message]
2021-05-12 14:16 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-05-12 16:29 ` Howard Melman
2021-05-12 16:55 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
[not found] ` <5AA9C2CD-D20B-4B9D-83D6-9002E9396558@gmail.com>
2022-05-13 18:32 ` Howard Melman
2022-05-14 2:19 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87fsys7tb8.fsf@rub.de \
--to=stephen.berman@gmx.net \
--cc=48317@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=hmelman@gmail.com \
--cc=larsi@gnus.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).