From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: dick.r.chiang@gmail.com Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#48949: 28.0.50; Thread-Process Liberalization Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2021 10:51:45 -0400 Message-ID: <87fsxni1a6.fsf@dick> References: <877dj1pict.fsf@dick> <8335tpaqvw.fsf@gnu.org> <871r98d7e3.fsf@dick> <83r1h8acpk.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="26002"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.14 (Gnus v5.14pre) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 48949@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 12 16:52:18 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ls4zh-0006Wf-Dm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 12 Jun 2021 16:52:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33192 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ls4zg-0001rm-AA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 12 Jun 2021 10:52:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52770) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ls4zT-0001rY-G1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jun 2021 10:52:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:58598) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ls4zS-00084u-5N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jun 2021 10:52:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ls4zR-0002pk-NN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jun 2021 10:52:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: dick.r.chiang@gmail.com Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2021 14:52:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48949 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 48949-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B48949.162350951410874 (code B ref 48949); Sat, 12 Jun 2021 14:52:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 48949) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jun 2021 14:51:54 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41911 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ls4zK-0002pK-87 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jun 2021 10:51:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qv1-f44.google.com ([209.85.219.44]:33404) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ls4zJ-0002p7-4V for 48949@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jun 2021 10:51:53 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-qv1-f44.google.com with SMTP id l3so11106885qvl.0 for <48949@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 12 Jun 2021 07:51:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=4cP+Kkt85KVIT5Kg+deyYplndeWsXSjUrdsBYfz3SFA=; b=Ry4cXxLhGnf61lSaxyAbhQyXr/EHYaHkBWbuHU2xs+DB1Ydhv2Li5Hq3LXGRMHJN8x 19OE/ijx/2EE3teb1f/lg9+3NXWobUnZCxk6ALsjIpERNd0KlhiG4oQFreQzY/sQ+WNO opZD8mbTPMulPq2Y4LScY7TaABZtVaDpMJ71S8/cYAWr89nF1y5utg22I/sBgshrbsHQ gjS9RH8S3nzaiCKmW5WEr/sb8EAcLRoedkPlrs36ICdFhr5qh2/Gm/eLK5WAlLmkyw4s blbGmmseBgNXED1dubRJqIz6qeQ2cXjMweJz7omMgaaNfckpi1KfliQbzR6Zrhdhe9AF 5R1w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=4cP+Kkt85KVIT5Kg+deyYplndeWsXSjUrdsBYfz3SFA=; b=FWxmjcoRd3TmOPnPKlVhrDomUSSuJrNVSyaXWEtVdnl4uivSnkWXeRy11asExWA/Km /53A8CytDoDwps8LLpjlAMtqU6kHicIFq8W/ewLYryJnEj2K67Mjqax6+8bkY3F6J3id Wm2Y4rHXb4FFcIlCB8hkM7H14r/NrRiSAz0Wp6gb3O375P3h0GpDd1Mrx4S0X2GUAnN0 V1liSctv5r+O0+X2N6+olYN6ghUzNIDiWIAw2Ape82hSwpcZgzonolYBBi32lfJZMi5W Uo4xUVrb6XgByGFz4dDp2Irnu/4tF847HNUVoK9Phue7DlQj8rifvN4qe1Y2FYd5Uxz9 TcQQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533UxIvEQpkJzJqyoAmFowPABhKJNvWaYJf8hU10P9dI4kqC4W+N CvF2nvhx58dbf9qkIxJsE+4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx0nsXUPJqK5qXhQCBg3nas9feiuO7Sm075+8GZRGlIY5R2p9gBFqRjvyEMm0z7NBwXiyNC/w== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:1021:: with SMTP id k1mr10239575qvr.4.1623509507485; Sat, 12 Jun 2021 07:51:47 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost (pool-71-190-212-171.nycmny.fios.verizon.net. [71.190.212.171]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q190sm6419283qkf.133.2021.06.12.07.51.46 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sat, 12 Jun 2021 07:51:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83r1h8acpk.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 11 Jun 2021 13:59:51 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:208387 Archived-At: EZ> why not unlock the process, so that its output could be EZ> processed by any thread? Yes, why don't I just call pset_thread(proc, Qnil) when the mood strikes in process.c? You make it sound as if pset_thread is an exposed defun. Nine years ago, tromey in commit 6c0d5ae declaimed the notion of locking a thread to a process. Other than raising an error when a thread tried to accept output from a process not its own, there appears to my untrained eye no other ramification, good or bad, of pset_thread.