From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#50256: thing-at-mouse Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2021 18:10:52 +0300 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <87fsuhkipf.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: <87sfys6ubm.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83y28fo1xf.fsf@gnu.org> <191e9cc6-7370-5b7d-7777-716b61e0155d@gmx.at> <83pmtrnydh.fsf@gnu.org> <158a8854-f56a-9aaa-3a14-d108e086a24c@gmx.at> <83k0jznms2.fsf@gnu.org> <87v93j9dfz.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87y28e4ysv.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83czpqzupp.fsf@gnu.org> <83v93hyl3l.fsf@gnu.org> <83sfykwyyb.fsf@gnu.org> <087851c3-b3b1-5130-f4b1-50cd42ef83a8@gmx.at> <83ilzgwp2w.fsf@gnu.org> <361bb63a-5e29-9785-0785-6c46f6621223@gmx.at> <874kazxm9o.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83fsujt1e2.fsf@gnu.org> <9f8a5ba5-b22d-a226-a25c-8a99ba91ebe0@gmx.at> <83czpmrmyi.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="2844"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 50256@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 06 17:42:40 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mNGlb-0000Xv-LA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 17:42:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43922 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mNGla-0001ws-HR for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 11:42:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33426) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mNGl1-0000SB-02 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 11:42:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42720) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mNGl0-0001s5-Nl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 11:42:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mNGl0-0007Cg-MI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 11:42:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juri Linkov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2021 15:42:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50256 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 50256-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B50256.163094290227613 (code B ref 50256); Mon, 06 Sep 2021 15:42:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 50256) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Sep 2021 15:41:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54258 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mNGkg-0007BI-IP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 11:41:42 -0400 Original-Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.195]:57655) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mNGke-0007An-QH for 50256@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Sep 2021 11:41:41 -0400 Original-Received: (Authenticated sender: juri@linkov.net) by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 957016000B; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 15:41:32 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <83czpmrmyi.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 06 Sep 2021 13:57:09 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:213608 Archived-At: >> > Thanks, but is that the best fix? It would mean any other Lisp >> > program that needs to do something similar will have to use such >> > kludges. >> > >> > But if I'm the only one who thinks this isn't clean enough, I won't >> > object to this solution. Just be sure to add comments explaining why >> > you do something as strange as that. >> >> Please explain why you think Juri's solution is a kludge and why it is >> not clean. > > Because it extremely non-obvious why the code does something strange > like that. I see no other way to fix it.