From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#50344: C-x v keybinding for vc-print-branch-log Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2021 15:11:06 +0200 Message-ID: <87fstdugid.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87mtoux1ha.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87o8998wf4.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <84e4e2ef-6c8d-3645-9e1e-3129981dd45f@yandex.ru> <875yvgvohe.fsf@gnus.org> <87y28burzd.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87o896kt5k.fsf@gnus.org> <87sfyhj3qw.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87zgsoctoc.fsf@gnus.org> <59a05468-2309-c6e7-5a2a-51426c208966@yandex.ru> <87tuiv4hvc.fsf@gnus.org> <87fsudsngq.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87k0jora9d.fsf@gnus.org> <7ba6c699-cfe5-4fa3-92dd-55b1e227aacf@yandex.ru> <874kaptwki.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <878rz5pc9i.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83ily91djz.fsf@gnu.org> <878rz5w9cf.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83ee8x1bn8.fsf@gnu.org> <834k9t0z9d.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8823"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 50344@debbugs.gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org, Dmitry Gutov , juri@linkov.net To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 07 15:35:01 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mYTY5-0001uS-5o for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2021 15:35:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37834 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mYTY3-0001VR-EA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2021 09:34:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57060) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mYTBq-0004jX-ST for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2021 09:12:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:34836) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mYTBq-0006RL-Ir for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2021 09:12:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mYTBq-0001Vo-72 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2021 09:12:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Robert Pluim Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2021 13:12:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50344 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 50344-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B50344.16336122755742 (code B ref 50344); Thu, 07 Oct 2021 13:12:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 50344) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Oct 2021 13:11:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46379 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mYTB5-0001UY-1T for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2021 09:11:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-f54.google.com ([209.85.221.54]:42902) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mYTB3-0001UJ-LX for 50344@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2021 09:11:14 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-f54.google.com with SMTP id v17so18931160wrv.9 for <50344@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 07 Oct 2021 06:11:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=89kR40I/r+qy/iA6UpUbrWklg8cCcWgWmwVPF6aBcnQ=; b=LZa3SR1tSlx3y4xcQI9QGuZXQb5scfltHyWtoPDEeqdpxx8ADd9myRiRV3+dFHWwMu EQWrWkYhht7ZMGEi8MHKshp9z8rGEcqBHFlVlWPkiSMwsnNd7lkPPXxRBdlBeVKUKmtb KG8/4Yk7wNOMlZPBfxxTfVt17017s6kAKUO+yc9juImQDi2x9lhZsloLeh4CeJksVydA mk/aqKuGSExNVA8jXPJPSxjPur2OBTXe3vd3rc5tTyewE28lZ9ojTviRN5NwQIMhRoeo jjfLXsuHPEpH0rJdXqrSUfo2S6v68LF036v1HL2SGf7Qv0oprdNhOiibwnMhU/vt4fk+ 5DLg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=89kR40I/r+qy/iA6UpUbrWklg8cCcWgWmwVPF6aBcnQ=; b=BRJgMZJCkqYl7D04VrMtJCrKZgwDMU0gIlGLzE1uu3uBhhJSAW5lkMSvTpIqroFzHq 8qH5LzBNWzGQA5tK2VQUGXvqBQCB0p5m5iFEy8z7z5GEbxpczfIwRK3H9+SSB/+cjP8V arVxDE5KrjUJ2B/RRLxfx3fN7pFNS2L1emqxf2Upakg/OtOiygxs6KOKFcvV2YEWMZ3z WKOdy/WswYTq1m6f8L138exT8MaMcomM5vP6fqifCt2zwnkDJDeuWYLwSG0b0mFE7X20 cm7I2hlDzeQcSQU1NcZexDdp7u0FkefSQ0qi0boxgvSuEWfPXjTXg+CicT7RQ4XtJFBs pc/w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5315INkCxSvauVhrdl5XYKiepSm5sFJpyFp4JDWDhmHUR4J4hbFP Mccj1hQU1M7HJbTVWqYkg7I= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJygTUJLa559hd+IsZCffq+eANT+aBKB497X7ABPqyJN1/TQ/YLGT4FGL9Ch6eq024zVEyt9RQ== X-Received: by 2002:adf:e0c1:: with SMTP id m1mr5439468wri.241.1633612267629; Thu, 07 Oct 2021 06:11:07 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from rltb ([82.66.8.55]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n66sm8979127wmn.2.2021.10.07.06.11.06 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 07 Oct 2021 06:11:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <834k9t0z9d.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 07 Oct 2021 15:56:30 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:216661 Archived-At: >>>>> On Thu, 07 Oct 2021 15:56:30 +0300, Eli Zaretskii said: Eli> That's the same as "no one", for the purposes of this discussion. >> Would you still deprecate it, with intent to remove? Or would you st= ill=20 >> keep the binding? Eli> I didn't say I was against deprecating the command. I said Eli> deprecating it is the only way to eventually usurp its key binding. - it=CA=BCs undocumented except in NEWS.21 - the workflow it=CA=BCs intended for requires you to use the (undocumented) prefix arg to 'vc-next-action' - and that workflow is something that I very much doubt anybody still uses (temporarily using RCS for CVS controlled files? Just use git, or hg or anything from the last 20 years) Eli> But deprecation will take time, and I was under the impression that Eli> Juri wanted the VC branch commands to have the binding NOW. I can see that we want to be careful about deprecation, but this command is *really* niche. How about we move it to C-x v B, and let Juri have C-x v b ? Robert --=20