From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Visuwesh Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#56237: 29.0.50; delete-forward-char fails to delete character Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2022 22:17:53 +0530 Message-ID: <87fsjr9xs6.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87v8sn9zo4.fsf@gmail.com> <83zghz8kk3.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtdz9ysx.fsf@gmail.com> <83y1xj8jqb.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35816"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 56237@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 26 18:49:12 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1o5VRg-0009Cp-Fz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2022 18:49:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42546 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o5VRe-0007fa-RN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2022 12:49:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59434) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o5VRW-0007fB-8L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2022 12:49:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54992) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o5VRV-0003D0-WD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2022 12:49:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o5VRV-0005UM-Tl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2022 12:49:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Visuwesh Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2022 16:49:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 56237 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 56237-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B56237.165626208521011 (code B ref 56237); Sun, 26 Jun 2022 16:49:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 56237) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jun 2022 16:48:05 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48889 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o5VQb-0005So-0d for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2022 12:48:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pg1-f196.google.com ([209.85.215.196]:40758) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o5VQY-0005Rp-D1 for 56237@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2022 12:48:03 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pg1-f196.google.com with SMTP id 9so6965913pgd.7 for <56237@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 26 Jun 2022 09:48:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YUZOdAl1URbWIAWs63UKjmC4I+NDfrYaZ/ntz8VE0+E=; b=JMkZ2H53LuPnMwAViEdcTuIcXY7eJG/L6RFsVuJIZcH/pxbFcmf5B62+TY3JY3w5gT BN4WqbiGIPi3r+zrHp70qfFWNz5sAYUZc9wdGNvndEnjX2iSzacx30TzfECZMdDUEasC WW3iNMkYKd9hliPhi91jSB62NioBs9ADqDC5qmatrH8ONvww/phd12r6BULmGOyoJIDX NfdpP+6rMQ5Svphwsw+EmsR/dwEz4AS0EB0hWobSKk6PZNEJzKl9hojr6rykS+S8+CpM ExAw8jKRUAV4i48d/tcn4Rb3OWWYEz1rqA3888iGQfLVKm0Jasdciqoy0lRuizZzEQD8 Gb2A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YUZOdAl1URbWIAWs63UKjmC4I+NDfrYaZ/ntz8VE0+E=; b=3qTJcNYoePukRdB/MWTL3/dsOsy73gMwKxlg2Dmg8vcymeS9zUCrQBfh6NjNGAt+sd aXZo4zxeDbMhQE0HyaTQglg+fN8ffi7XpQ6szP8mSJcZuATHNqdoTHxIQiRtS4PO1Z5Z AyGxhEP1jQIUh3rWjnn4Ukh3aWMqAB0z2Nd+s6wFS9cDnYHT7OfKz6eKTTqtQ8ALlq97 dCSDulzgDFsOlPqjCunmhKIrnVADEYI4DP7eTd4n2Gq1DXhM2dgPt+5tv04spQlvVUiZ PJCVUE3QPjDFS1s37j8kr+rNjfZWnPWqGavGZxKtGFl8ln+ppUMwGUQKqgat6LYWJEBn rA+w== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora/KlRNFs4LVSESqtuqdC3nqo9YONv4YlG3n5ynW+5IcY1EQtWrQ EEihhPmenlwB/mPfaqGrRHBoctuG4t8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1v5bFqy8o6dP20R4CLgTVqmBSmWhIEHI7o9vVL7xAFk/eFiYC7vbGr7/O3NW6qpYI5blnhVpA== X-Received: by 2002:a63:6dca:0:b0:40c:aac5:a671 with SMTP id i193-20020a636dca000000b0040caac5a671mr8996231pgc.198.1656262076329; Sun, 26 Jun 2022 09:47:56 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost ([49.204.136.42]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a5-20020a1709027e4500b0016784c93f23sm5385219pln.197.2022.06.26.09.47.55 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 26 Jun 2022 09:47:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83y1xj8jqb.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 26 Jun 2022 19:36:44 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:235378 Archived-At: [=E0=AE=9E=E0=AE=BE=E0=AE=AF=E0=AE=BF=E0=AE=B1=E0=AF=81 =E0=AE=9C=E0=AF=82= =E0=AE=A9=E0=AF=8D 26, 2022] Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Sorry, I misunderstood the report. > > I tried to fix this now on master. Thanks for the quick fix! Unfortunately, delete-forward-char still deletes two clusters instead of one in "=E0=AE=AA=E0=AF=8D=E0=AE=AA=E0=AF= =8B". :( I.e., |=E0=AE=AA=E0=AF=8D=E0=AE=AA=E0=AF=8B becomes | where | denotes the point. [=E0=AE=9E=E0=AE=BE=E0=AE=AF=E0=AE=BF=E0=AE=B1=E0=AF=81 =E0=AE=9C=E0=AF=82= =E0=AE=A9=E0=AF=8D 26, 2022] Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Visuwesh >> Cc: 56237@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2022 21:55:50 +0530 >>=20 >> I was under the impression that I could safely rebind C-d to >> delete-forward-char. > > The main point is not the key binding: there's nothing magic in C-d > per se. The point is the delete-char and delete-forward-char behave > differently inside composed sequences, and that's intentional. Right. For my use case, I never need go into the composed sequence so I rebound C-d to delete-forward.