From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#56974: 29.0.50; Missing documentation for former subr-x macros Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2022 04:15:42 +0200 Message-ID: <87fsi8re7l.fsf@web.de> References: <87o7x0jgz7.fsf@posteo.net> <83les42lfd.fsf@gnu.org> <87a68jjbdn.fsf@posteo.net> <871qtuc30u.fsf@gnus.org> <871qtuno0u.fsf@web.de> <87tu6p5zts.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="26315"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 56974@debbugs.gnu.org, Philip Kaludercic , Eli Zaretskii To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 07 04:16:14 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oKVpt-0006fK-Sy for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 07 Aug 2022 04:16:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56376 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oKVps-0000ok-BY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2022 22:16:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35484) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oKVpi-0000oA-U9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2022 22:16:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45980) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oKVpi-0000X4-JP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2022 22:16:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oKVpi-0007CT-DN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2022 22:16:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2022 02:16:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 56974 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 56974-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B56974.165983855527645 (code B ref 56974); Sun, 07 Aug 2022 02:16:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 56974) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Aug 2022 02:15:55 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35729 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oKVpa-0007Bo-LS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2022 22:15:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.14]:33939) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oKVpZ-0007Bb-2U for 56974@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2022 22:15:53 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=web.de; s=dbaedf251592; t=1659838546; bh=AS8gZGIcicTdlZ3PswrHuF54kGMIwCSLxetQTrFHAok=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=iGgTAgbCX+t0P4/oyoefyv442Zt41WjovnJnV4vgZFkIMAaF2astJ7nlNyj70+ZsF IkqM/v4PtXM1aqZkSmM5JjSW7ghtsieDuwErBDWZ4j3KUM7EQdUOQ/6YdfIv7mGNDf aawv6QVLlncxbVpkdZpkZSC9OgvDmj/kg+fr4EKU= X-UI-Sender-Class: c548c8c5-30a9-4db5-a2e7-cb6cb037b8f9 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([84.57.248.18]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb006 [213.165.67.108]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1Ma0Tg-1nxTAk0C9M-00WP5z; Sun, 07 Aug 2022 04:15:46 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87tu6p5zts.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sat, 06 Aug 2022 14:19:43 +0200") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:TvWJoSpk3RX76UJK8mJ3x4XA5+j9pleGwltG7EDNFh0pcy4kAXL garGykjAcmlTOPcNLibWIhjXNlDjj6LWZVNUFj8VaVXXu+GK5c3l6CcGBMD1Jz1NTIiLp+l Zf0WgzqlaNTRx7m190mVbiU9WgRSjHJdEC8kY4XuC7+rgZA2r7WzqZdWOroLXNrSPt0J6Zk HUpz6ITIP/5YOpoxzrtgA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:Mkm5eJ8ePy0=:i3H+vl+GUpa6Vfx7I4yOb/ ogukYiCnMeXF3ynND+NMf+VN2Dc4QRRMcOzvoBVXqujGTvQzWDwWTPFqkh8gI+6QAWtOJXkfc vhcUsjJOBr2412fyLlfX4xqSx8oXJckLsDB/m7rjKG6T3zBtndJPpbSQ9MKqgzLqy4Nd4PBI/ ose2mE92Y+Z/zP5Xgk3sLb6nMQbaFup+7v18q+uMghvsBeQuHBSfuHy4l+osjSy01gFbbpYfO 2Gc7zZ3cRLe2KvpDdYfHWpgeKBMKPVoMDdhOQMIYsmjAZGzQx47COxgBSMaNtSH6ph4LB4JMe /Um0VKhsd+4Mzru52ALMrwxKAXz+W/pyVKn9VwTW0F+MF+qx1R8yRYptkpmciRJsRkNQdXOPF UTBfEp7F3ayKz31hYD4yexHpS3jmQGLfD32Hqyb36FQA593L4+Lca9SFbXX5YBKd6kqLJCgqy Re9ZrMyoCQsLfEQjZkK6eww6ADhCRLp2se21czL1i5etVks4xi8/XXmuMpkG9mWSMWOxtaEp8 5mBPQv1WukFqmrbv7/B8M/dW80OTAAkvc1xBLGb1gScf1m4VU7MeOqKBd2tEEo1zpBtK/PhF6 mYoYk0PWSnrajXEXO+t+hrnFt26Bg0d4a66PmMI+xBMqzlM9YubkTSU91Qk+8y/BJIdSSdbk0 ctUyufpmJ05pDlQyoV4YI8JmOYzDHZFTLFOwDAiUDZcZq3zWv5HA5j1w6RcCToN8U9q5rnhvI FRGgxguE4lTTNideTX5T6cxGNbJeMWlP4+VTKx7rdN6B3UTTzvtHgikagQkqh3YvOSpb932n X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:239017 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > when-let is a 3:1 winner over when-let* in the Emacs tree, so I think > the public has spokeneth, and we should document when-let and not > when-let*. (And just pretend that when-let doesn't have the compat > forms in the manual.) Could be that most uses date from before the new names had been added. AFAIR using the * names was an agreement in some thread in the past - when this had been discussed the last time. Personally I don't care that much, both names are equally good (or bad). I would make them synonymous. Although when-let and and-let are already synonymous names... Michael.