From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Vladimir Nikishkin Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#57792: 29.0.50; async-shell-command fails with prefix-argument on -master Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 22:17:23 +0800 Message-ID: <87fsgu2g0f.fsf@laptop.lockywolf.net> References: <87pmfy38sg.fsf@laptop.lockywolf.net> <87czby82ne.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27280"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: mu4e 1.8.6; emacs 29.0.50 Cc: 57792@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Kangas To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 14 16:23:21 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oYTIO-0006u3-Fw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 16:23:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49688 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oYTIN-0007Jp-AE for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 10:23:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57728) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oYTI6-0007IF-TX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 10:23:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38749) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oYTI6-00030V-GV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 10:23:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oYTI6-0003Zs-BZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 10:23:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Vladimir Nikishkin Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2022 14:23:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57792 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 57792-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B57792.166316533213691 (code B ref 57792); Wed, 14 Sep 2022 14:23:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 57792) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Sep 2022 14:22:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55681 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oYTHI-0003Yl-B2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 10:22:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pf1-f169.google.com ([209.85.210.169]:39490) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oYTHE-0003YV-KH for 57792@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 10:22:10 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pf1-f169.google.com with SMTP id u132so15075860pfc.6 for <57792@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 07:22:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:date:subject:cc:to:from :user-agent:references:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=GXs/ZOXhHL7Q97COlg0EctvmWV1RFDMEE1DXAVrJM3o=; b=hugRQfZxU4WssaMY6JpJagJskKLokJjUzFBxxr9j8LV8oVkJg1k2ETIvM6MMlRnWg4 pCl7AsghRHu+cLXtw8pG3zDHzQCzUwOvgbdUkL0sA8z6jvLRgBhI2vTjPmciIWjLt7I4 NV8idzawR1jl3apjHXvokoFQ4lDBaGcck5CzVs9CJL3IJ0OXxFBabuJ1RA/ccF3rwj3p sHFDV7+VTZTZ2opzVnnqjjjkZl8UxcHxxgfq6X/BBBZX7XjWXowk+O1rif5GkRa5TUJY WzG/xQ/JhBSZ7aQOv6N+8MFGTJlo7SbferMIujatK+sB8db5K3pl6kH6GPvEnUpXyoAt 383w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:date:subject:cc:to:from :user-agent:references:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=GXs/ZOXhHL7Q97COlg0EctvmWV1RFDMEE1DXAVrJM3o=; b=KtN9yQ7WPLzty+bTrglGymQdLYsCfGg6xFE7ENj8eZEK8ZCVxPyPAPtsiyR2Qb3PTb IW7mhDAMnTFCwZ5qEt6HXNuXuD5G1XtmqxMJWXUx6nXIZDg/mnBuLqimvaDEJRfkyDNp g0iIarTYP9+UEEA7ifLzAfCzjBZFJVJrXv2Hsnyc4xWRMYfsvrLyy2LZWyuAmsMIOuB+ edrpw2cRyt8ECX6dYPprTzYhFeD0ZO//obyYF70VAVuKNPyEkL7jjGOriwkJ+6dCHw56 FGMzfZSYn3j+m+DfILLELQzOMZGcHSGwYlXGFMPSysOpndCeTjg703nJ6CUJhaxZ98Fg dczw== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo3ANsuQCGpM4QX3UZTx5rsEvhbLw1Ttc1ROnTFlRbskJcFetKE7 OYIV4tidmzNYCr4IpuQZ767YEwChmILC3A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR7KqNn6YPk7yOXzmFC6GCQ/3zrTx0ht9jkg8BmuLgkgwwUT7c92H7QNe16JVFgTBpvReAjPbA== X-Received: by 2002:a63:354e:0:b0:439:837:692f with SMTP id c75-20020a63354e000000b004390837692fmr13083024pga.74.1663165322016; Wed, 14 Sep 2022 07:22:02 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from laptop.lockywolf.net ([2001:470:24:315::102]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w2-20020a1709026f0200b00172ba718ed4sm10805632plk.138.2022.09.14.07.21.52 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 14 Sep 2022 07:22:00 -0700 (PDT) In-reply-to: <87czby82ne.fsf@gnus.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:242465 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Stefan Kangas writes: > >> I can reproduce this bug on master, 27.1 and 28.2. Here's a test case >> (not tested): >> >> (ert-deftest simple-tests-async-shell-command-57792 () >> "Test for https://debbugs.gnu.org/57792 ." >> (with-temp-buffer >> ;; Pretend we have a prefix argument. >> (async-shell-command "echo \"test\"" '(4)) >> (should (equal (buffer-string) "test")))) >> >> I'm not sure what behavior we want here, though. Should we insert the >> command output directly at point in the current buffer, or should we >> first insert it into "*Async Shell Command*" and copy it over when done? > > The prefix isn't documented to do anything (and currently bugs out), so > perhaps we should just remove the prefix from the interactive spec > instead? > Is the intention that `C-u M-&' insert the output in the current buffer? I am quite sure it used to do that in the past. Perhaps, as late as 27.2. I can try to do a bisect to find when exactly this has changed. Moreover, it would be analogous to C-u M-: inserting the return value into the buffer at point. -- Your sincerely, Vladimir Nikishkin (MiEr, lockywolf) (Laptop)