From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Po Lu via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#58021: 29.0.50; Remove old font.c code Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2022 18:07:06 +0800 Message-ID: <87fsgicsl1.fsf@yahoo.com> References: <871qs21mmd.fsf@elite.giraud> Reply-To: Po Lu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="25328"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.91 (gnu/linux) Cc: 58021@debbugs.gnu.org To: Manuel Giraud Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 23 12:08:40 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1obfbs-0006P6-0g for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2022 12:08:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51720 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1obfbp-0005db-V6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2022 06:08:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47084) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1obfbH-0005WR-Fx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2022 06:08:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40416) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1obfbG-00022j-T8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2022 06:08:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1obfbG-0006sj-E7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2022 06:08:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Po Lu Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2022 10:08:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 58021 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 58021-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B58021.166392764626411 (code B ref 58021); Fri, 23 Sep 2022 10:08:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 58021) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Sep 2022 10:07:26 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39494 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1obfag-0006ru-8V for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2022 06:07:26 -0400 Original-Received: from sonic307-56.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([66.163.190.31]:43450) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1obfac-0006rd-2e for 58021@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2022 06:07:24 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1663927635; bh=8vVcOdvh7us5w3wT+BAhFcPdc1Vybckj314TAKRD3y4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From:Subject:Reply-To; b=FqNi76OTAkynEibEsfb86mL/fL8jztbmbiMQZvKWLkO+5nt2AgE8/5bSPid+2F3nhrzTCDbUkT4gZ7NbytOCTuU1cNyuNQrXvUvyVD3gZy2XzNc6u3E3nysbSkC0AohSnxHlJsWzFLtUtsfFTzFHyKxJZeAsU0bUDzSNgVjVE5OSkp+JaUagOWSn22viNm6BwTnIURXEiT6IPKPywYlYjX++L5lTjSwo8MqrOuXF9SQ6/8Bg9YLqN32VekEpSradDz9O3z2utF+Qpdz/l76ORB2658jJ8StN7HDZK2rhiEzOfnaLGC6cd4HnoS6fVqFCSI8K/CtAqmkfDlEmRWd34A== X-SONIC-DKIM-SIGN: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1663927635; bh=HTI99jXzrGWc6f5xqDoudgYeFtCPCwhaIz6JuFTA6yo=; h=X-Sonic-MF:From:To:Subject:Date:From:Subject; b=eWCe0aNtQcDlW7GeDst5GzJXv6XzueDCpLx8cJz2HBe5Feixj7zL8JgF8ltFZyTG2g8BPO4pmDzk2v96MnleiFDi58fHNlP194NAHnyqqXkyu2MZb62cVztnGXfeGhAQ2vrMCcUkJrc18bxVxkh0JwvEJeMHwXYHDsxWo9zmyIUpibgEqQmnQXJ24BHjZehDfCfAAkaD7mqGriqn5JweVrOrcBNhfjcCh6gKX36PBgJA0fpPVCOxp1x6aca5BxKbqYtHLTERRVsGl6p27KScrDVkiXr173B89XZxtQMndXZ/3jAN40xlPoQ3D78mSwgpPdBjbEL8QbzQ6FqTRLm4hg== X-YMail-OSG: EKwaJckVM1msY.5xIzLQwH1xGfnbuZdbB7auz4jNDKXkmkY9nogY5jJ5P4et545 F5wU03wKut61uOL1mtALZbd_6nGvAC7ixy8UHM6T0RA71oOSX15P545YjZSIsm1KI0uPCgVOlVSt iJq.i0Ch.YCzSqeLwIR2QD1DLC74ChqZtqA.3KfF9zCAVQ5gaFdqNTjktQUxhxBJO4KQMFBhHd6R lhECUpgFDsMiZSdh_aiUZLEPgDXrtIYrqXSzBkTTUk5L.kCpSdSBKHONWci2B6XsdcsW8tOyy.7S 0JHYuzMEEFbpeYX5eHoD7Y.BB5VphmCTQQiLjfVJWpSE3CwKEMvuLeFQPsQI67uaSkyepHYapMYs JPhIj5iQ59pTm.nguFdwd0wcBsQNes.TI9D8sKcZzIRod0jUzVNjxWzeK9Mc7jlUmn07kP3yj2Oo qYNtB2SZgoBgIEGlW01GM3P2zu6oqBzk24t5Kep56PrJEDOWveArsv7FsO5JLhQ45t9L4Xi9bTji Yml6X8L5EyAhkRWA1_7Am2_IPwFUrOsezRvRGBBcBn.Xi_cQidbl3vfJRzmIwnKAHCxXcp8nTneC _2_axaDFFBGMpZtTTOcVxtmn6NDr4.FfbWjnv2Dj2tJCPfQUmiF_MHyqhr2x8R9cBTJGxUR.0_YD YMGQtCaHGY_Sk1LPz_GMJJLuRYwnQeWpensDC9OWiDZigr1EgCBxjnt11MjrPxVxlrQiekJWDUo0 _IAEosJ3oy6Ox7v22nwBAGPw_oeGQ_5Axyy.JELRi._scxBs8ckrtzj8zKk7GWlN5MGEco9aO1lF oeMuWEK4OF6FvbFeSOKsD7dVvljRqmQcm3F0HPNg93 X-Sonic-MF: Original-Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic307.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Fri, 23 Sep 2022 10:07:15 +0000 Original-Received: by hermes--production-sg3-dfffdfbd4-w9dkc (Yahoo Inc. Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 730b060c51b02b60ccbb4a30244b16c2; Fri, 23 Sep 2022 10:07:12 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <871qs21mmd.fsf@elite.giraud> (Manuel Giraud's message of "Fri, 23 Sep 2022 11:11:22 +0200") X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.20663 mail.backend.jedi.jws.acl:role.jedi.acl.token.atz.jws.hermes.yahoo X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:243457 Archived-At: Manuel Giraud writes: > Hi, > > Here is patch that removes some old "#if 0" code from font.c. Most of > this code seems to be "#if 0" since 2006 (when font.c was introduced) > and was only "updated" for overall interfaces change. > > Maybe it was kept as hints for future readers but I found this code to > be a bit misleading as it has drifted along from how things are actually > done now. I think Eli insisted on keeping that piece of code.