unofficial mirror of bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Joseph Turner via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: jonas@bernoul.li, 65414@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#65414: save-some-buffers-functions are unexpectedly called when save-some-buffers pred is non-nil
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2023 23:38:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fs46cn6u.fsf@breatheoutbreathe.in> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83o7ixqatx.fsf@gnu.org>


Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

>> From: Joseph Turner <joseph@breatheoutbreathe.in>
>> Cc: 65414@debbugs.gnu.org, jonas@bernoul.li
>> Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2023 16:57:06 -0700
>>
>> magit-save-repository-buffers docstring reads "Save file-visiting
>> buffers belonging to the current repository." IIUC, prompting to save
>> abbrevs here is an undesirable implementation side-effect.
>
> Why is it undesirable?  save-some-buffers always saved abbrevs, didn't
> it?  And it did so independently of PRED, right?  So how did this
> problem suddenly started affecting Magit?
>
> IOW, I still don't have a clear idea what caused this problem, if
> (AFAIU) it is a problem that started happening recently.

This problem is not new. However, now that save-some-buffers-functions
has been added, the problem goes beyond abbrevs.

>> Another example: hyperdrive.el adds to save-some-buffers-functions for
>> saving hyperdrive file buffers:
>>
>> https://git.sr.ht/~ushin/hyperdrive.el/tree/d7dc7a08ba47761108cf98e21ffa2d8dad28f34a/item/hyperdrive.el#L99
>>
>> After this change, magit-save-repository-buffers now prompts to save
>> irrelevant hyperdrive file buffers. I would like some way to tell
>> hyperdrive--save-some-buffers not to prompt the user to save hyperdrive
>> buffers from inside magit-save-repository-buffers.
>
> Why do you want to do that?  Whether or not to prompt the user abides
> by the common protocol defined by save-some-buffers: if it's called
> with the argument ARG non-nil (which should happen interactively when
> the user invokes the command with a prefix argument), there's no
> prompt, otherwise Emacs prompts.  Why magit-save-repository-buffers
> wants to break this common protocol?

I think magit-save-repository-buffers follows the common protocol
correctly.

> I feel that I'm still missing something important, which causes you to
> want a different behavior from magit-save-repository-buffers.  For
> starters, can you describe how magit-save-repository-buffers ends up
> calling save-some-buffers-functions in enough detail for me to
> understand why you think saving these buffers is deemed "undesirable"?

The issue is not that save-some-buffers prompts instead of saving
without questions.

What is undesirable to me is that save-some-buffers unconditionally
calls each one of save-some-buffers-functions, regardless of PRED. This
means that when save-some-buffers is used with the intention to save
only a handful of files (as with magit-save-repository-buffers),
save-some-buffers-functions are all called, even when irrelevant.

Thanks again for your patience :)

Joseph





  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-26  6:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-21  4:06 bug#65414: save-some-buffers-functions are unexpectedly called when save-some-buffers pred is non-nil Joseph Turner via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2023-08-21 11:56 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-08-23 23:57   ` Joseph Turner via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2023-08-24  5:16     ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-08-26  6:38       ` Joseph Turner via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors [this message]
2023-08-26  7:26         ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-08-26  7:32           ` Joseph Turner via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2023-09-02  7:30             ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-09-03 17:06               ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2023-09-03 17:29                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-09-03 17:52                 ` Joseph Turner via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2023-09-03 19:03                   ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2023-09-03 19:04                     ` Joseph Turner via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2023-09-04 10:53                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-09-04 15:54                     ` Joseph Turner via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2023-09-04 15:59                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-09-03 17:22               ` Juri Linkov
2023-09-03 17:44                 ` Eli Zaretskii

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87fs46cn6u.fsf@breatheoutbreathe.in \
    --to=bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org \
    --cc=65414@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=jonas@bernoul.li \
    --cc=joseph@breatheoutbreathe.in \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).