From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Po Lu via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#66151: 29.1.50; daemon crashing after X forwarding disconnects Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 20:00:24 +0800 Message-ID: <87frvhimuf.fsf@yahoo.com> References: <87jzl63rhd.fsf@yahoo.com> <87cyqw4ta9.fsf@yahoo.com> <874jc63u8a.fsf@yahoo.com> <87r0f932qz.fsf@yahoo.com> <86sezjdkdk.fsf@gnu.org> <87r0f1iuuw.fsf@yahoo.com> <86jzktbo2s.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Po Lu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="25536"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: 66151@debbugs.gnu.org, georgepanagopo@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 19 14:01:04 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rxmvP-0006SH-NW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 14:01:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rxmvL-0002VJ-PO; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 08:00:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rxmvD-0002TW-RP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 08:00:54 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rxmvC-0003Jj-FF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 08:00:51 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rxmvQ-0007U4-FC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 08:01:04 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Po Lu Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 12:01:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 66151 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 66151-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B66151.171352806128714 (code B ref 66151); Fri, 19 Apr 2024 12:01:04 +0000 Original-Received: (at 66151) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Apr 2024 12:01:01 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58196 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rxmvL-0007So-2D for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 08:01:00 -0400 Original-Received: from sonic307-56.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([66.163.190.31]:35404) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rxmvH-0007RV-Of for 66151@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 08:00:57 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1713528036; bh=xnCsvyPfSrNXkDIWOqa3YrWErvDiGMzxHt58rVj3Q+A=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From:Subject:Reply-To; b=hcEQyMIouANCY2E3UF+utkHL396YCV6ntgFI7A8tWUWM46fujgxDK1N0WQpbPlHLIR3smh+g6XXo8FGqtyysgOA+MHEhj34yrxQ085r+9p5pJzNSvc1FOHzYdGgIqwce31ZleCI/aKfkpAv7zhZYbFllmkOaDJ7N3784Is3wFboGqZerQk7QF6xbz6ywWWGlNkdUkVuEK+r26wgS2Avw0vvmOZ7c5vUxmnduaZoWKP9k9YpgPSM683s44exNt4qbABznj5LeDK5V7kiN9/qq/bHwlN3nQ2t05TYF4Izo79iSlBWNRQO+LnPQ/ON0JU62FsGqOOLuS7l/GrDiQa2w4A== X-SONIC-DKIM-SIGN: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1713528036; bh=hHHZH15a+2ayukcKBP8NifIaZLBbGWvXHBXqFmTwP5n=; h=X-Sonic-MF:From:To:Subject:Date:From:Subject; b=iW1xtJPpKq8qwOzrpsiNsksbbVGmw9F+BrwTWwemr/k2Crk756+zn4UTTTv/IESwu+LA16/DrUpdDZv+OFW7brthozoD5Eqz7QDU8XC7Jld6mNRGkhzZULx66H0XAlNU0LrqQj6Xv9Iiz9gPxg0wroSy62I+evKREuLhweqo8uanw45LAqNr7qB0lk6FbTZnEybgDONPMNR9cRywewQoq3qj+EmI0IQzBKGPGxPHMq5OHXtOf7FW0rHdpqWEDs6J2x8mkSX5M7mx1tBKx/GGMIVty72g9/dlFXkWtBg3F5FGVrrf75bor3Fmezc8BCf+kVbtoNB2t22h9RIK16riLw== X-YMail-OSG: iuqQW8oVM1kBiTW2HvRexbcc0rsYJOLux2IT32PmhOZW2z5h2jwCMqDlSwTOSML bHfIBNXUnoku77bFdrV2lYTRKkCodF9ZytSJsdj0QaFftw_YvCB_pscgX2PES80IUPJEorJ3UQ4T Lw.5dMBHeKQgw.C7v7iYPPnHfacd8vt1Yznf8s1NyWM3TgGvWJs2kzOUQ5WF3TeUIbo_JFcZnuca toLKxdLtFpGEvMQ9D7ti1PL4dYuNCeh551e971tq.GGBjG79b.ZXcTROb4anBJbCWfP.Pgqr3OaD CH0P40mUJjqob17OnMZpqJjtNVmIaCzyQjYe7bNdnrsKkKCoBVn1X7wz9IDKrw5O0SFk3tLkMHht sGO.DRm5C4si14rYD9Yu5hn.S0qObhMeNQsflF_fniWQ2zQzl34Atq.FPjgGp0bVZTFkwVCDahmG FIuJMae.BUXik5yu.xFzf5oW6Or2XjKz1P5oxaZ12R0u6poQLLNb.UvVLMM0sFeQPD7vUYYRsgW2 XCXE5t5SCssvK95rw_jxlICBFOsT3F67c8iY72AiFVzf3D.FZYfhebO3dyhvWBdk9iXlTCaKSqVg DyXzWIntcRvzYfhtzi6MsG47Z0H3Mmpk0px5QPhHQwq_3zmnunQFkQmuW_l6lKLxhWcFiZZ2BvJb 7quMoblKq.EGCWI8zMVz2dJvkXb5c0sk9eDoSpMf4UWmwnOak2.YOAXQEvWYB.qNKa0ngG7glc_x ZANyecih44ux.fvcySPcX5GwMSAjXe5NVawVvaSBRraxR7fam.5R16nz2LI1Nxekh7vxUgVm1aSd 0SEkfrL3xcaViHSsVuCO5w9lyMGuCoKWc.ajgJXiYf X-Sonic-MF: X-Sonic-ID: 95bbd0e1-6e2f-4904-a87c-043b535346dd Original-Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic307.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 12:00:36 +0000 Original-Received: by hermes--production-sg3-6f9f87bd85-86wsl (Yahoo Inc. Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID ad9ef4ee9b84de4f4e8c597ca97283fd; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 12:00:32 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <86jzktbo2s.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 19 Apr 2024 14:15:39 +0300") X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.22256 mail.backend.jedi.jws.acl:role.jedi.acl.token.atz.jws.hermes.yahoo X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:283676 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Are you sure it should be !FRAME_LIVE_P? No, it should be the express opposite. > Why would we condition the call to recompute_basic_faces on the fact > that the relevant frame is no longer alive? What am I missing? Nothing, if my hurried preparation of the patch counts as nothing... It was altogether less successful than my simultaneous preparation for rush hour traffic.