From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7499: Documentation: `comint-dynamic-list-filename-completions' Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 19:55:23 -0500 Message-ID: <87ei9xjax0.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1291511753 12820 80.91.229.12 (5 Dec 2010 01:15:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 01:15:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7499@debbugs.gnu.org To: MON KEY Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 05 02:15:48 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PP3Cc-000588-CO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 05 Dec 2010 02:15:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50700 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PP3Cb-0007lL-PF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 20:15:45 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=39009 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PP3CD-0007bk-U3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 20:15:22 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PP3CD-00045b-0V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 20:15:21 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:33350) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PP3CC-00045R-Ut for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 20:15:20 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PP2ni-0005U7-GD; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 19:50:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 00:50:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7499 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7499-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7499.129151019121063 (code B ref 7499); Sun, 05 Dec 2010 00:50:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7499) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Dec 2010 00:49:51 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PP2nX-0005Tc-2N for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 19:49:51 -0500 Original-Received: from vm-emlprdomr-05.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.146]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PP2nU-0005TI-J6 for 7499@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 19:49:50 -0500 Original-Received: from furball (dhcp128036014248.central.yale.edu [128.36.14.248]) (authenticated bits=0) by vm-emlprdomr-05.its.yale.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oB50tOda007435 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 4 Dec 2010 19:55:24 -0500 Original-Received: by furball (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E6A8F16059F; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 19:55:23 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (MON KEY's message of "Sun, 28 Nov 2010 15:46:58 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 130.132.50.146 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 19:50:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:42167 Archived-At: MON KEY writes: >> The term "help buffer" is apparently used here loosely to mean >> "auxiliary buffer helpful to the user". >> > > Its less than apparent (to me at least) that such loose usage is helpful. :) I've checked in a fix for this, and related docstrings. Thanks.