From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: jidanni@jidanni.org Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7953: closed (Re: bug#7953: >>> valid XML?) Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 07:56:40 +0800 Message-ID: <87ei1w74nb.fsf@jidanni.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1310428645 1071 80.91.229.12 (11 Jul 2011 23:57:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 23:57:25 +0000 (UTC) To: 7953@debbugs.gnu.org, rgm@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 12 01:57:21 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QgQLn-000417-7C for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 01:57:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42728 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QgQLm-0001S8-6t for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:57:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:50910) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QgQLX-0001S0-On for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:57:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QgQLW-0001If-HS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:57:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:39039) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QgQLW-0001Ia-Fa for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:57:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QgQLV-0000d4-OP; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:57:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87zkqfrgll.fsf@jidanni.org> Resent-From: jidanni@jidanni.org Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 23:57:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7953 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug Original-Received: via spool by 7953-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7953.13104286122400 (code B ref 7953); Mon, 11 Jul 2011 23:57:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7953) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jul 2011 23:56:52 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QgQLK-0000cf-W7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:56:51 -0400 Original-Received: from caiajhbdccac.dreamhost.com ([208.97.132.202] helo=homiemail-a60.g.dreamhost.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QgQLJ-0000cT-0l for 7953@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:56:50 -0400 Original-Received: from homiemail-a60.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a60.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 608EF3BC06E; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 16:56:43 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=jidanni.org; h=from:to:subject :references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s= jidanni.org; b=IY3gDqJCgpOnBx6yGrQOSfm/AH7kHD8batrT8/jrMP/5D6jbO jq2UEQThL0L4lE9Fv4mdz9eRpcfgot4/E8T6NjbxpezrqwQf+/BKNe0+yB+1Ubhw /fw0JlQ2pTtV/AZyK9ZXWhZLMZ1Sohe4rYnuukj6TAfkh1c1Y3kFsDESvY= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=jidanni.org; h=from:to :subject:references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=jidanni.org; bh=0ocqZKgTucVMiCsbMXWVcPC+fgs=; b=KwWKAYSBcAkdh rdkiIPoI+NIt3YK32grdqaWqtomeuqKhAr4UaeYBz2N7lvXAJuos5Kqn/Z0ZGRys p+2z71sVhphP64HukOgiTbutImCrhVpzfzDI9oPjY4hWa1Pu9wfZavvDxcSmJK06 TnQwiTfqVPxf2YS9ghs84ZO6Xi76Z4= Original-Received: from jidanni.org (218-163-2-112.dynamic.hinet.net [218.163.2.112]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jidanni@jidanni.org) by homiemail-a60.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 012443BC06A; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 16:56:42 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:57:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:48675 Archived-At: Glad to know that you say it is valid XML. GbTS> A random sample of online XML validators have no problem with this kind GbTS> of thing. GbTS> From: jidanni@jidanni.org GbTS> Subject: >>> valid XML? GbTS> To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org GbTS> Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 22:09:58 +0800 (22 weeks, 6 days, 9 hours ago) GbTS> nXML mode still says this is valid XML, despite the >>>>>>. GbTS> GbTS> GbTS> ...Chernovtsy, Ukraine>>>>>>