From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10405: 24.0.92; XML parser -- problem handling comments Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 16:47:19 +0800 Message-ID: <87ehulbkh4.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87fwfovpx5.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1327654123 9837 80.91.229.12 (27 Jan 2012 08:48:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 08:48:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Mark A. Hershberger" , Alex Harsanyi , 10405@debbugs.gnu.org To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 27 09:48:39 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RqhU6-0001bY-MY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:48:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42391 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqhU5-00083v-DD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 03:48:37 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:41390) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqhTy-00083h-4c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 03:48:35 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqhTt-0001MV-Sa for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 03:48:30 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:40783) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqhTt-0001MQ-Pc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 03:48:25 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RqhUU-0002Ml-0z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 03:49:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 08:49:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10405 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 10405-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10405.13276540889016 (code B ref 10405); Fri, 27 Jan 2012 08:49:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10405) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jan 2012 08:48:08 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46170 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RqhTb-0002LN-Gr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 03:48:08 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:36923 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RqhTZ-0002LG-D4 for 10405@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 03:48:06 -0500 Original-Received: from [155.69.17.161] (port=44785 helo=furball) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqhSx-0006LE-1l; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 03:47:28 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87fwfovpx5.fsf@gmx.de> (Michael Albinus's message of "Mon, 09 Jan 2012 16:47:18 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:56075 Archived-At: Michael Albinus writes: > Hi Mark, > > I don't know whether you still care about xml.el. If yes, yould you > please go through this bug report? For my eyes, the proposed patch from > Alex looks OK, but you might know it better. I've committed the patch to the trunk, so that it can be in the next Emacs 24 pretest. Mark, please feel free to weigh in if you prefer a different fix.