From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10635: 23.3; Docstring for `defcustom' fails to mention that `:safe' keyword takes a predicate. Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 18:03:32 +0800 Message-ID: <87ehuivn9n.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87y5sr9wij.fsf@naesten.dyndns.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1327831449 22241 80.91.229.3 (29 Jan 2012 10:04:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 10:04:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10635@debbugs.gnu.org To: Samuel Bronson Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 29 11:04:08 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RrRcF-0001Xn-Pb for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 11:04:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40035 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrRcF-0006pc-AJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 05:04:07 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:54494) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrRc9-0006pM-0i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 05:04:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrRc8-0001mY-0E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 05:04:00 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:39359) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrRc7-0001mO-TR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 05:03:59 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RrRcA-0006ZK-5X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 05:04:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 10:04:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10635 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10635-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10635.132783142725219 (code B ref 10635); Sun, 29 Jan 2012 10:04:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10635) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jan 2012 10:03:47 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42979 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RrRbv-0006Yg-Cd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 05:03:47 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:57709 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RrRbt-0006YY-IO for 10635@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 05:03:46 -0500 Original-Received: from bb121-7-229-69.singnet.com.sg ([121.7.229.69]:48016 helo=furball) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrRbo-0004Qz-RK; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 05:03:41 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87y5sr9wij.fsf@naesten.dyndns.org> (Samuel Bronson's message of "Sat, 28 Jan 2012 19:34:44 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:56190 Archived-At: Samuel Bronson writes: > I've taken the liberty of creating a patch, in which I also fix a > `checkdoc' warning: Thanks. I added the manual link as you suggested, but I don't think it's worth going into more detail than that about the safe-local-variable property within that docstring.