From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11194: 24.0.95; sudo rm doesn't work with absolute directory paths on the file system Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 15:35:50 +0200 Message-ID: <87ehriseyx.fsf@gmx.de> References: <877gxrbz1p.fsf@rbdash.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87obr2cwtu.fsf@gmx.de> <87ehrwdbhs.fsf@gmx.de> <87r4vwqd3q.fsf@gmx.de> <87zkajsn4e.fsf@gmx.de> <87r4vvsjor.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1334929018 6838 80.91.229.3 (20 Apr 2012 13:36:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 13:36:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Cray Elliott , 11194@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 20 15:36:57 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SLE18-0001Yz-0N for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 15:36:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53312 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SLE17-0007Qd-DK for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 09:36:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42981) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SLE0y-0007QE-Oc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 09:36:51 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SLE0s-0004ze-K6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 09:36:44 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:42790) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SLE0s-0004zZ-Fl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 09:36:38 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SLE1G-0002M2-E5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 09:37:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Albinus Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 13:37:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11194 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11194-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11194.13349289929016 (code B ref 11194); Fri, 20 Apr 2012 13:37:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11194) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Apr 2012 13:36:32 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43823 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SLE0l-0002LM-OP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 09:36:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23]:55162) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SLE0j-0002L6-7t for 11194@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 09:36:30 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 20 Apr 2012 13:35:57 -0000 Original-Received: from p57BB97C9.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO detlef.gmx.de) [87.187.151.201] by mail.gmx.net (mp071) with SMTP; 20 Apr 2012 15:35:57 +0200 X-Authenticated: #3708877 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+vZ9pjAD2vG6goK6WZnEBwx25Y9uQfn9/rjT3wU3 E6LQnC+c+/fnJv In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:23:08 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:59318 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: [Sorry for the delay, I was busy in RL last days] > I'd be happy to hear of arguments in favor of the current behavior of > eshell/sudo w.r.t builtins. I've checked the implementation of eshell/sudo: It simply let-binds default-directory to "/sudo:user@host:dir", and let the command like rm run. That's why the built-in version of rm is in place. Another implementation of sudo would not be in the spirit of eshell, I think. > Stefan Best regards, Michael.