From: Noam Postavsky <npostavs@users.sourceforge.net>
To: Eric Abrahamsen <eric@ericabrahamsen.net>
Cc: 29220@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#29220: 26.0.90; eieio-persistent-read fail to restore saved object.
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2017 08:24:28 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87efov1zzn.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87zi7kyzcf.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> (Eric Abrahamsen's message of "Fri, 17 Nov 2017 20:39:44 -0800")
Eric Abrahamsen <eric@ericabrahamsen.net> writes:
> (Are you guys looking at a different version of the pcache repo? The one
> on Github uses `constructor', not `make-instance'.)
The version mentioned in #23:
I've put an branch (pte/emacs-26) on github
(https://github.com/PierreTechoueyres/pcache.git) with some tests that
you can launch with
> The call to `eieio-persistent-read' does basic slot value validation,
> but this function is additionally checking that all of the entries in
> the hash table are of the proper class, that specified in the
> `entry-cls' slot.
>
> But I still think the problem isn't in reading, it's in writing: the
> entries in the hash table are being written incorrectly, and so this
> validation step is exploding.
Yes, the way structs and classes are encoded in emacs-26 changed, so the
way they're written changed also. It seems the round-tripping loses the
class/type maybe? I can still see the '44' entry in the hash table, so
the hash table itself is still in there...
> I sure don't know why setting `print-circle' to t would have solved it,
> though...
Setting print-circle only lets the read work without error, the read
object still fails the pcache validation.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-18 13:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-08 22:04 bug#29220: 26.0.90; eieio-persistent-read fail to restore saved object Pierre Téchoueyres
2017-11-08 22:48 ` Eric Abrahamsen
2017-11-10 17:31 ` Pierre Téchoueyres
2017-11-10 18:12 ` Eric Abrahamsen
2017-11-10 18:32 ` Pierre Téchoueyres
2017-11-12 19:10 ` Noam Postavsky
2017-11-14 22:30 ` Pierre Téchoueyres
2017-11-15 2:02 ` Noam Postavsky
2017-11-15 15:29 ` Stefan Monnier
2017-11-17 19:56 ` Pierre Téchoueyres
2017-11-18 3:40 ` Noam Postavsky
2017-11-18 4:39 ` Eric Abrahamsen
2017-11-18 13:24 ` Noam Postavsky [this message]
2017-11-18 18:14 ` Eric Abrahamsen
2017-11-19 3:17 ` Noam Postavsky
2017-11-19 5:57 ` Eric Abrahamsen
2017-11-23 23:20 ` Pierre Téchoueyres
2017-11-24 0:09 ` Noam Postavsky
2017-11-28 21:39 ` Pierre Téchoueyres
2017-11-28 21:52 ` Noam Postavsky
2017-11-28 22:18 ` Pierre Téchoueyres
2017-11-29 1:09 ` Noam Postavsky
2017-11-29 15:18 ` Stefan Monnier
2017-11-28 22:10 ` Eric Abrahamsen
2017-11-29 15:15 ` Stefan Monnier
2017-12-01 17:25 ` Eric Abrahamsen
2017-12-01 17:55 ` Stefan Monnier
2017-12-03 0:17 ` Eric Abrahamsen
2017-12-03 18:35 ` Pierre Téchoueyres
2017-12-05 1:27 ` Eric Abrahamsen
2017-12-05 2:08 ` Stefan Monnier
2017-12-05 17:47 ` Eric Abrahamsen
2017-12-05 19:02 ` Stefan Monnier
2017-12-05 20:56 ` Eric Abrahamsen
2017-12-05 22:14 ` Stefan Monnier
2017-12-05 22:58 ` Eric Abrahamsen
2017-12-08 10:41 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-12-09 16:59 ` Eric Abrahamsen
2017-12-12 23:21 ` Noam Postavsky
2017-12-15 20:26 ` Pierre Téchoueyres
2017-12-15 22:26 ` Pierre Téchoueyres
2017-12-16 23:42 ` Eric Abrahamsen
2018-02-20 19:50 ` Pierre Téchoueyres
2018-02-24 21:23 ` Eric Abrahamsen
2018-02-24 23:21 ` Pierre Téchoueyres
2018-02-24 23:40 ` Eric Abrahamsen
2018-02-25 0:34 ` Pierre Téchoueyres
2018-02-25 18:59 ` Eric Abrahamsen
2019-05-27 23:36 ` Noam Postavsky
2019-05-28 21:17 ` Eric Abrahamsen
2019-05-30 22:50 ` Noam Postavsky
2017-12-18 19:52 ` Eric Abrahamsen
2017-12-18 21:38 ` Stefan Monnier
2017-12-20 18:29 ` Eric Abrahamsen
2017-12-20 20:54 ` Stefan Monnier
2017-12-21 2:21 ` Eric Abrahamsen
2017-12-24 2:18 ` Eric Ludlam
2017-12-28 18:44 ` Eric Abrahamsen
2017-12-05 22:20 ` Pierre Téchoueyres
2018-01-24 19:17 ` Pierre Téchoueyres
2018-01-25 3:09 ` Eric Abrahamsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87efov1zzn.fsf@users.sourceforge.net \
--to=npostavs@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=29220@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=eric@ericabrahamsen.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).