From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#28070: 24.5; doc string of `eval-buffer' Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 19:39:31 +0200 Message-ID: <87ef2rb3jg.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="137180"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 28070@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 15 19:40:07 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hn4xL-000ZZR-2q for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 19:40:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41386 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hn4xJ-0000OJ-WA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 13:40:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48629) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hn4xH-0000Nu-5W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 13:40:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hn4xG-00084n-4f for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 13:40:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40144) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hn4xG-00084f-1I for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 13:40:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hn4xF-00062r-Sw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 13:40:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 17:40:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28070 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 28070-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B28070.156321238023184 (code B ref 28070); Mon, 15 Jul 2019 17:40:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 28070) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Jul 2019 17:39:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48962 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hn4wu-00061s-0n for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 13:39:40 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:46064) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hn4wq-00061f-S1 for 28070@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 13:39:38 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=sandy) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hn4wl-0001hR-OW; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 19:39:35 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Sat, 12 Aug 2017 15:45:25 -0700 (PDT)") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:163149 Archived-At: Drew Adams writes: > The doc string should, like Elisp manual node `Eval', mention that this > does NOT always "Execute the current buffer as Lisp code." It acts on the current buffer restriction, if any. > > As the manual says: > > `eval-buffer' operates on the entire accessible portion of buffer > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > That qualification changes everything. We don't always need to point > out explicitly that a particular function acts on the accessible portion > of the buffer, but it is important to do so in this case. Looks like this was fixed in 2015: --- Execute the accessible portion of current buffer as Lisp code. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no