From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#38011: 27.0.50; [PATCH] WIP on allowing Gnus backends to return header data directly Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2019 15:49:21 +0100 Message-ID: <87eeyqfi4u.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87y2x0a9bl.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87a79f3cu3.fsf@gnus.org> <8736f7l9rd.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="206656"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 38011@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eric Abrahamsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 02 15:50:25 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iQujR-000rf6-1c for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Nov 2019 15:50:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48224 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iQujP-00014o-6F for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Nov 2019 10:50:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52197) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iQujA-00013G-DQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Nov 2019 10:50:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iQuj5-0005lY-Sa for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Nov 2019 10:50:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:52231) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iQuj5-0005h2-Or for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Nov 2019 10:50:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iQuj3-00086Y-LO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Nov 2019 10:50:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2019 14:50:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 38011 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 38011-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B38011.157270616831096 (code B ref 38011); Sat, 02 Nov 2019 14:50:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 38011) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Nov 2019 14:49:28 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32819 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iQuiV-00085U-OG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Nov 2019 10:49:27 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:56158) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iQuiU-00085L-I1 for 38011@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Nov 2019 10:49:26 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iQuiQ-0003Yq-Bs; Sat, 02 Nov 2019 15:49:24 +0100 In-Reply-To: <8736f7l9rd.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> (Eric Abrahamsen's message of "Fri, 01 Nov 2019 11:41:26 -0700") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:170806 Archived-At: Eric Abrahamsen writes: > Okay, that makes sense. So it's basically a flag saying header retrieval > is cheap enough that we might as well pull in more old messages than we > otherwise would. Yup. > Hmmm... nnmaildir needs some love. Indeed. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no