From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#39115: 26.3; eww consecutive links look like one link with mouse-over Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 13:18:04 +0100 Message-ID: <87eevqs6wz.fsf@gnus.org> References: <861rrrdjui.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="116013"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 39115@debbugs.gnu.org To: ynyaaa@gmail.com Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 23 15:09:45 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iudB3-000U9a-4z for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 15:09:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57706 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iudB1-00069L-RC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 09:09:43 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46480) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iubRu-0000WR-VV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 07:19:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iubRt-0002p7-SM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 07:19:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45932) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iubRt-0002or-Ov for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 07:19:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iubRt-0005Nx-Lb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 07:19:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 12:19:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39115 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 39115-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39115.157978189420649 (code B ref 39115); Thu, 23 Jan 2020 12:19:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 39115) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jan 2020 12:18:14 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51905 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iubR8-0005Mz-Iv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 07:18:14 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:47980) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iubR6-0005Ml-PR for 39115@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 07:18:13 -0500 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iubQz-0004OY-0X; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 13:18:07 +0100 In-Reply-To: <861rrrdjui.fsf@gmail.com> (ynyaaa@gmail.com's message of "Thu, 23 Jan 2020 10:47:49 +0900") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:175145 Archived-At: ynyaaa@gmail.com writes: > I think it is enough to replace 'mouse-face property from 'highlight > to (list 'highlight). Ah, yes, that works, because the mouse-face is compared with eq. Does anybody know whether there are any drawbacks to doing this (besides having an extra cons cell)? Presumably the display would be slightly slower, but probably not noticeable. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no