From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?=C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n_?= =?UTF-8?Q?N=C4=9Bmec?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#36837: 26.2; whitespace-mode: whitespace-line-column is not set to local fill-column Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 09:14:11 +0100 Message-ID: <87eeufb030.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20190729111756.0665feb6@ventiloplattform.tastytea.de> <87k1bvfwda.fsf@gmail.com> <20190803095056.75166d14@ventiloplattform.tastytea.de> <87imrebo1c.fsf@gmail.com> <85imjvahee.fsf@gmail.com> <87zhd7219o.fsf@gmail.com> <87zhd69o8y.fsf@gmail.com> <83mu93gva9.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="96094"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Notmuch/0.29.3 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/28.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: tastytea@tastytea.de, 39427@debbugs.gnu.org, 36837@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , Noam Postavsky Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 28 09:15:18 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1j7anm-000OtQ-AF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 09:15:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43352 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j7anl-0004LF-77 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 03:15:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41868) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j7anY-0004JO-GS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 03:15:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j7anW-0005Rh-Da for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 03:15:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54646) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j7anW-0005Rc-Ae for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 03:15:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j7anW-0005nd-6G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 03:15:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?=C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n_?= =?UTF-8?Q?N=C4=9Bmec?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 08:15:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 36837 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 36837-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B36837.158287764622187 (code B ref 36837); Fri, 28 Feb 2020 08:15:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 36837) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Feb 2020 08:14:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60616 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j7amc-0005lm-Kh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 03:14:06 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-f66.google.com ([209.85.221.66]:42279) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j7ama-0005l0-Ro; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 03:14:05 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-f66.google.com with SMTP id p18so1864724wre.9; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:14:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NrI7yQDFOHoamV8pi5ckrfw6Ha74iAs5VruWrre12HI=; b=S4FQfTtIEeU/EZZ1tQns0y2KCJ/uv0xKhdG5xelI7XB9xnNSm5+/3z6kadKwG5PEhX +VTN+kvuBFsh6RyHvLNgtaPXAGQRMSnJqIStkM41DRHOsrop7kSRh+pFM/UJLEjjMEDB 51CRPUg/HTGmylCW63vtcB85C4dav6PWPJgHc02mBS1s1XV0LGjVRp1aDU4ZHUYEwrds mamrwUujCquzNrdmC7Jkwg2gw8L28HgpSe2KjU+wU5Ao2nfzv8a8HVR7ZROwE+hCg0cN xuplq2XfU+Xczl4H7/KaZLuhMI14WpUReqdB5X4tXXyR/OfuTSZtpMp6NAFHTfV5CaZK hOOg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NrI7yQDFOHoamV8pi5ckrfw6Ha74iAs5VruWrre12HI=; b=G/irJ+tQhFvhq3J34xfRezGNZNfw4hKWmTVqXS4aaU1hZyhBoAooxVA3IV3uA9EBqU 0bUIP0NnB9+nphv9pih4iRlxgnHwxPDYELVEMcKUErddumTwAZc6zB+MK8UuMIKIx7bt 2KwNfqAVET8CkdWqkmfKVUlr0VnSm7ncmfQbgBfbC445b8rJHOwLS8z0IzZwJFW4mGmZ legd+7vt0+cYxi8q0AHbu7BBjP5lMdDcaRelAjlwC8n7+YKvqVKF7mLuJEynUlsbKEV+ wIg11qM88+39WrIlyUjh9pMXWlQFb14kEaZxQqw8PsVHnKgk/JcnJhsI7UyywdHYil4p iq5A== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUIZLZS1+1RNADQNniWJLonpud1dXyrBzQRC9bQ+VK9aKJyvufC slXseJ2nOZ7oHlwrN46Gs8Y= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyfFNAyBe/houJkUq8f/cQOOWne5kAvx/2voC0Q7JSBSiHFF4EDXFaxoBlBivg0Z5nkfnuh4g== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f091:: with SMTP id n17mr3466814wro.387.1582877639030; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:13:59 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from localhost ([185.112.167.59]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d7sm1196580wmc.6.2020.02.28.00.13.57 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:13:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83mu93gva9.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:176558 Archived-At: On Fri, 28 Feb 2020 07:01:18 +0200 Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Noam Postavsky >> I've been somewhat out of things as well, but I believe emacs-27 is >> still open for bug fixes. And I would classify this as a bug fix, so no >> NEWS needed. > > I won't argue if this is a bug fix or not, but why is it urgent to > have this in Emacs 27? I find that question hard to address (isn't the "bug fix or not", and of course _your_ and other maintainers' personal definition of "bug fix" and "urgent" precisely the crucial factors for answering it?). Personally I don't see any reason not to consider behaviours observed in both bug reports bugs, but "urgent" certainly sounds more dramatic than I feel about it. IOW, I don't feel strongly about having to have this in 27, especially in case of any doubts on maintainers' part. --=20 =C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n