From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#41544: 26.3; Possible incorrect results from color-distance Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 15:44:50 +0200 Message-ID: <87eeo4m5kd.fsf@gnus.org> References: <5C4A633D-8222-4439-BE37-9B8674F1DA6D@acm.org> <83367ccf8w.fsf@gnu.org> <624D7FB8-A836-4A7E-8895-47E867214504@acm.org> <83o8pyc4bq.fsf@gnu.org> <55D73CA5-1EFB-4B0A-8F8B-FDA1D39F51BF@acm.org> <835zc5bsut.fsf@gnu.org> <3BBCFDD4-C14D-4628-91CB-2A0456A96FC7@acm.org> <838sh0abzz.fsf@gnu.org> <83r1us8kw6.fsf@gnu.org> <020DE875-14A8-457A-9AE4-AA0925DB8997@acm.org> <83img48ffx.fsf@gnu.org> <83bllw82xt.fsf@gnu.org> <1B0F31C8-1E11-4527-A053-DD2DE8235F58@acm.org> <83wo4g5hz6.fsf@gnu.org> <49B7D7B5-D9E3-4E97-A749-CF5E8D8EE2C6@acm.org> <83mu5b5573.fsf@gnu.org> <83lfku69q2.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="30697"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: simenheg@runbox.com, Mattias =?UTF-8?Q?Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= , tom@tromey.com, 41544@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 18 15:46:20 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k81wS-0007ro-KA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 15:46:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38628 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k81wR-0000p3-Ac for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 09:46:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53978) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k81wA-0000oo-M4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 09:46:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51251) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k81wA-0004KS-Cs for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 09:46:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k81wA-0005my-AM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 09:46:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 13:46:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41544 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 41544-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B41544.159775830218639 (code B ref 41544); Tue, 18 Aug 2020 13:46:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 41544) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Aug 2020 13:45:02 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34564 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k81vB-0004qO-W1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 09:45:02 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:32804) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k81vA-0004q1-Ju for 41544@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 09:45:01 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=c2kR48xifqUvT/KcFHRLym9SIZawk15PloxS/mhWjY0=; b=Py0tv8rAvnxPxJEc88t+gQ06JP S0c1Qr6wSJxZRDbtyAwka6NLH5hSl23+Z1un/IdNsWIiKzZz6+uKShTSRm2kirspVm0g3r7w8wAjr DzrM/3Bbc6qRcyzRsUyvTUjTruJWykLR3xiRt34NxZT3eUmfI6kTE5gHNtuhJJ2sJB2o=; Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k81v1-0007WC-Tj; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 15:44:54 +0200 X-Now-Playing: Cocteau Twins's _Echoes in a Shallow Bay_: "Great Spangled Fritillary" In-Reply-To: <83lfku69q2.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 10 Jun 2020 21:45:25 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:185481 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > I gave all the reasons I have. They are serious, at least to me. > They have nothing to do with the quality of your research or of the > resulting code. They have everything to do with considerations of > stability, and with weighing risks and efforts vs advantages. If you > don't regard such considerations as technical arguments, so be it. I understand your objections to changing this behaviour, but the new, correct calculations make things a lot better. Would it be possible to add the new calculations with a defcustom to say whether to use the new or old methods? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no