From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#51596: image-transform-resize has inconsistent semantics wrt scaling up/down Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2021 23:52:40 +0100 Message-ID: <87ee7vpm87.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87fssbu7wh.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3624"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 51596@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 04 23:53:19 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1milbh-0000bV-72 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 04 Nov 2021 23:53:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33906 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1milbf-0006a9-B9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 04 Nov 2021 18:53:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49516) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1milbS-0006Zf-GT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Nov 2021 18:53:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60541) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1milbS-0007s0-7m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Nov 2021 18:53:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1milbS-0005rR-03 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Nov 2021 18:53:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2021 22:53:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 51596 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 51596-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B51596.163606637122510 (code B ref 51596); Thu, 04 Nov 2021 22:53:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 51596) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Nov 2021 22:52:51 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43854 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1milbH-0005r0-9V for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Nov 2021 18:52:51 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:60384) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1milbF-0005qn-Ib for 51596@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 04 Nov 2021 18:52:50 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=ow7Z/DDd4+WmwmDEgufS+3C6U6FOfBMnw2SBeREYlwc=; b=t5vUDdF+R2QlHj4/V2kX0Xgtf0 Aa/dUe3Jx5ByNjh1USOiv8Se+Bnps2UGmRepZDNSt8GSFNO2XqTuMYHU0vubhudiauASRZIGYyC/B gHNQ+uf4wZ+90k4LcPcbzgT8O10mU9IrJC8xj1bO2k4g2z5x2GJ9TKq2fOQFw8fh8bGc=; Original-Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1milb6-0007F6-QD; Thu, 04 Nov 2021 23:52:43 +0100 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAD1BMVEUqJCC8iUK3r6zp 4tv///9tovfAAAAAAWJLR0QEj2jZUQAAAAd0SU1FB+ULBBYvGoU6mAIAAAG4SURBVDjLdZQNcsQg CIUxuYCYCyhcoIH736081DTbaZ3Z7ZTPx8/Dluh1Ss0fB/X45r8PUf2QxKeHYoT2Axw7FcDRpIv0 jJQ+dT3u1/NWcTHEF0c6DgXXWriGWALIAo0iEofovA9xl5aqCWZ7ZxcFKCblAQVAQmDWCckGaqxO uZnHGZW5zuILtMPUzY3vy2a7Ky6XQBGd+V1gSE3nqjpqu/bCTQZFn1zSSbUEbhGoCS544De3jLuU VmFZKFAAIOOu46qU3ta1k+YmCQpdN01QmiimQzI5uKjNrsRfx3iwhoKJXc1kQ3O2tVsWCy9Yt2QM ZhkAjAHGK5+wx+boymZun4Y8GZ2aJuCMhTGTCRSazTxFci+xxmtqn3iKAKZHP0BMsDEOYLXBdFyM +xpG6wIiZXkOaS3hp7WoEQBnZ5S4pPICq09dC0bxBWb9uGaYPjZ4+hvkIBJrb/X0mU2fpo2gyJuT 7ELWAPJ5yAb4JQbwO7qSz6OpH/DqF5EH7Bp/ABv4O1uxN7jxHNf4hjHQ1XwClM8rpta54V3D8ymh J3Qv/ihyuV/bl1eqJNtjS9B+XufqNuP833+f9g3+sogCuMgKmwAAACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTpjcmVhdGUA MjAyMS0xMS0wNFQyMjo0NzoyNiswMDowMI/C3vEAAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6bW9kaWZ5ADIwMjEtMTEt MDRUMjI6NDc6MjYrMDA6MDD+n2ZNAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC X-Now-Playing: Ben Neill's _Automotive_: "Showdown" In-Reply-To: (Stefan Kangas's message of "Thu, 4 Nov 2021 11:52:16 -0700") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:218951 Archived-At: Stefan Kangas writes: > Right, and that's a valid use case of course. I still find the > interface inconsistent, as the naming scheme suggests that these three > options should behave similarly. Yes. I think that, basically, the fit to height/width commands are pretty useless -- nobody wants that, because it'll inevitably make some images impossible to view. The two cases that make sense are "scale down so I can see the images" and "both scale down and scale up, because I want to see as much detail as possible". > Perhaps we could even have a "smart" option that only scales images up > larger than some height and width, and otherwise leaves them in their > original size. That's probably the one I would like to use, now that I > think about it. (I usually prefer to scale images up, but as you point > out it's pretty useless to scale small icons to fit the window.) Sure, or a "don't scale up more than 200%", perhaps. That's less finicky, I think. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no