From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jai Flack Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#54662: 29.0.50; [PATCH] An mu backend for gnus-search Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2022 12:29:13 +0000 Message-ID: <87ee2dav6u.fsf@posteo.net> References: <87ee2hk2ey.fsf@disroot.org> <87r16filc0.fsf@gnus.org> <87h77b7bpb.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87mth3ik0i.fsf@gnus.org> <871qyesxzk.fsf@posteo.net> <87k0c6js10.fsf@gnus.org> <87pmly9q2b.fsf@posteo.net> <87lewlgmyk.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37997"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 54662@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 04 14:31:03 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nbLrL-0009fw-2Y for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2022 14:31:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46586 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nbLrJ-0007iW-LX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2022 08:31:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47728) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nbLqN-0007ga-2D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2022 08:30:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:56867) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nbLqM-00077Y-Nb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2022 08:30:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nbLqM-0002q6-Gb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2022 08:30:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Jai Flack Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2022 12:30:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 54662 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 54662-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B54662.164907536810837 (code B ref 54662); Mon, 04 Apr 2022 12:30:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 54662) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Apr 2022 12:29:28 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50763 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nbLpn-0002oi-N3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2022 08:29:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:40369) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nbLpm-0002oV-5t for 54662@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Apr 2022 08:29:27 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFE4E240028 for <54662@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 4 Apr 2022 14:29:19 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1649075359; bh=fChgiGxc/CHREc5smi34TLLE+tUGChG17pWMo6j7GCQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Autocrypt:OpenPGP:From; b=o4eX1OeAtwAAc8kTx0W0RFvw+xfrquujcYLLHgqO9aUqZFxZ1Fn8cJKCRYhyUPVgY Vt0nTp6lBcJMx0fRqobMZII3sdMP5IW2qXeKdkzgTf23mf8VJF3UyfRjx7sanrwuY0 QnCl5YygYq9rm0cN0kEYTj/CGJXsQpzAnocxDA302D549nOPG33BYH6HDUBewVnGLC ZeKodDs576SeVf/aMyD2nZt4a2R8ZgVHtrnX64CIJq156uCIhE4beh4EgYjfncR7KH 5VfJD2DBgx731afQ1btDnHPzAwd9OISeplm3AZ3MhJ3atsXZtEcIL4JDON8xGDA7sm IPQso9jm+ElTg== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4KX97f070yz6tmw; Mon, 4 Apr 2022 14:29:17 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <87lewlgmyk.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Mon, 04 Apr 2022 12:30:27 +0200") Autocrypt: addr=jflack@posteo.net; keydata=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 ABQsJCAcCBhUKCQgLAgQWAgMBAh4BAheAAAoJEBqfJR2Uid2ecj8QAJEcWZf+HM OpenPGP: url=https://posteo.de/keys/jflack@posteo.net.asc X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:229407 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Jai Flack writes: > >> I'm not sure if you read the discussion on emacs-devel but the issue of >> having a duplicate feature in-tree and as a package for Emacs 28 was >> briefly discussed without solution. > > No, didn't read that. Does that mean that the ELPA package doesn't work > in Emacs 29? The package works fine, it just redefines some symbols (to an identical definition); I would just prefer to avoid duplicated code if possible. I'm not sure how many users there would be of this as an ELPA package for one Emacs version so it's very possible it's not worth the effort. -- Thanks, Jai (Can never seem to get signed emails from Gnus that also look right in plaintext)