From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Pankaj Jangid Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46621: Copy line Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 16:42:22 +0530 Message-ID: <87edzfr5ux.fsf@codeisgreat.org> References: <87tuq99ova.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <07496A25-CD5D-46E6-8F1C-7BD29143F3C8@acm.org> <87o7yoyj38.fsf@gnus.org> <449B2624-107D-4083-AE74-989F39C93936@acm.org> <871qvkvft6.fsf@gnus.org> <181B4CC3-B934-45AE-A7E8-9AF2B70C302E@acm.org> <87bkum1eyc.fsf@gnus.org> <861qvikk4l.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87zgi5uyr1.fsf@gnus.org> <86o7yl9oc4.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <878rppuo9j.fsf@gnus.org> <87wnd8r4v2.fsf@codeisgreat.org> <87y1xnzuog.fsf@gnus.org> <87a6a3ree0.fsf@codeisgreat.org> <871qvfzr60.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6201"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 46621@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 23 13:13:17 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1o4Klw-0001Ok-7x for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 13:13:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52042 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o4Klv-0005ln-3y for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 07:13:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37596) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o4Kli-0005jF-Ue for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 07:13:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:43701) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o4Kli-0006Ki-LH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 07:13:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o4Kli-0005WE-GL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 07:13:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Pankaj Jangid Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 11:13:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46621 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 46621-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46621.165598275421179 (code B ref 46621); Thu, 23 Jun 2022 11:13:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46621) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jun 2022 11:12:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37598 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o4KlF-0005VX-SS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 07:12:34 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pl1-f181.google.com ([209.85.214.181]:46760) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o4KlD-0005VJ-5q for 46621@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 07:12:32 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pl1-f181.google.com with SMTP id q18so6439074pld.13 for <46621@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 04:12:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=codeisgreat-org.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=gJCoFM9LLjQ3IJ+axhRKGfVOfUCmyVD8NHO5WX6ZEUY=; b=DxX+YQ2d5kKKKAoSpCpcAet85HaeXvJpFjeL5hkfmbiBAScH4km1XzGISZdFlUIC0G YLePcYZwgfrnywuKCaniV3CmKaxJ+DahobzODXPQq28MUBvOcsXxOdwOX1D275Oypbzn 0eBU6w/Uhjl9Bf10/9+njaha3SRVP7I4e4wPT2UAwEpauGRB1VNIfy/Zl+YMQxkEloTo ehUg/HMLYnAhyq3Or2bnDgBIxNOIeY7rGuDsbnnwCVLFjLXInYJICNsMUhXO+cfvaQAq pGgfKbYl2bea7fToNs42wZ1tlULqJqJmPjaz9Og+agYAx4CStWskEX2HuLXhUfCiEx8O mqGw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=gJCoFM9LLjQ3IJ+axhRKGfVOfUCmyVD8NHO5WX6ZEUY=; b=gk5pT0RW3Bz47Vt6yglNwnJTYUdvzhh/iJnd+wia3OOqpwjWjTu5IjjSwnQeNIQ25H FZkuKHRrZxBBKEqd4m5nlPLW9FWT/HZFTvVcNsTpDe/Tl+ShaYUQFjtIpz/KrJsdt6ZJ EDIIYe+WL/FbTDbKhAhzXiiAQpJk6UYFk8uWxm7rbsX8NK4CIGw5qDnNYhQFiZ0/oD4q 4Z/G4cfc3YQIh84LsGDi24yZzrDTJxnGnKLOooZCUkkyLaDnY5zf0s5GPyBaaaIi2IsD UTMMwcTrOsVrI3NEVmQU0rek2XL6EepYFIe9/BTzFrJ5TY11aUiF2Q7ZT6L2pqVYIS3m Nh0g== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora+e6Dn6YT3FplsY8JobF2jdfU4twR2l/1bH9GxouTkk97UwvHlC KlxLlWY4IA80ixxNVnp3Nj3axOuN5+bi+g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1ssiuViloi2+oIIJDLMSo69I+3djMLVGiJuij4kh3hK0Dy9zVVUOBMIfzQ5p5xHxCHM2BaNmA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:c81:b0:1ec:7760:fcbd with SMTP id v1-20020a17090a0c8100b001ec7760fcbdmr3510029pja.208.1655982745238; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 04:12:25 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from anant ([49.36.238.183]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l10-20020a17090a660a00b001ec7c8919f0sm1592190pjj.23.2022.06.23.04.12.23 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 23 Jun 2022 04:12:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <871qvfzr60.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Thu, 23 Jun 2022 11:04:55 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:235101 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Pankaj Jangid writes: > >>> But why do you want point at the end? You want to edit those duplicated >>> lines, presumably. >> >> Yes I want to edit it from the end. Beginning of the statement is mostly >> common, I just want to replace "b.h>" with "c.h>". > > "The end" here would be after the final duplicate line -- not at the end > of the final duplicated line, though. So I think that putting it at the > start of the duplicated lines would make more sense even here. If it is /after/ the final duplicate line than that is not what I was vouching for. I wanted it /at/ the end.