From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Colin Baxter Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#57412: Could we make linum.el obsolete? Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 17:55:24 +0100 Message-ID: <87edx3ndvn.fsf@yandex.com> References: <83o7w82n3j.fsf@gnu.org> <87bks7dzu4.fsf@gnus.org> <001fc7b6-a724-b191-77a8-94c7eeec8a69@yandex.ru> Reply-To: m43cap@yandex.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="2161"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , Stefan Kangas , Eli Zaretskii , monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 57412@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 26 18:58:43 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oRcfL-0000Na-6V for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 18:58:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48802 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oRcfJ-0005OG-QO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 12:58:41 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50638) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oRceh-0005Nd-CA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 12:58:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:36457) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oRceh-00070A-3u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 12:58:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oRceh-0003PV-0L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 12:58:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Colin Baxter Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 16:58:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57412 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 57412-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B57412.166153304213003 (code B ref 57412); Fri, 26 Aug 2022 16:58:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 57412) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Aug 2022 16:57:22 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54435 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oRce2-0003Ne-7s for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 12:57:22 -0400 Original-Received: from forward107o.mail.yandex.net ([37.140.190.210]:48500) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oRcdz-0003NQ-Kk for 57412@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 12:57:20 -0400 Original-Received: from myt6-265321db07ea.qloud-c.yandex.net (myt6-265321db07ea.qloud-c.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:c12:2626:0:640:2653:21db]) by forward107o.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 92B026AFEC3A; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 19:55:28 +0300 (MSK) Original-Received: by myt6-265321db07ea.qloud-c.yandex.net (smtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id GOQgBQu9Rf-tQi4fijD; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 19:55:27 +0300 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client certificate not present) X-Yandex-Fwd: 1 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.com; s=mail; t=1661532928; bh=p3y7yMsz1PuESXZ1NgBkeBxjDk/0Esci6a8ft9GgcOc=; h=Message-ID:References:Date:Reply-To:Cc:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; b=hoZSNLY2VASC6mt1z7FaSmFOnX/dW3zz2MJrtboWtPlDc/E3bJK0opyyHbYE1bjkm d+5fr9PwUl90EqGSIUZw/Mql/Htl3f/JS8TV6N89SWXTj5m5eW1Qgu+hfg4VCwEHiT SLoHJhEqgLnQb8Rqd1Oj9alxkwZ09wSMOEf7GDPc= Authentication-Results: myt6-265321db07ea.qloud-c.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.com In-Reply-To: <001fc7b6-a724-b191-77a8-94c7eeec8a69@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Fri, 26 Aug 2022 14:19:59 +0300") X-Face: BHjiJOg/Qmj'BQgsAKL@])L)e62P)C"Y=6T Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAAEkAAAATAgMAAAChCMjeAAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAACVBMVEX/zAABCWP///8I RHjYAAAAAWJLR0QCZgt8ZAAAAAlwSFlzAAALEwAACxMBAJqcGAAAAAd0SU1FB+UFEAk5BvqS634A AAAbSURBVBjTY2BgCA1hYA0FAxDDgQEERsXoIAYA2F9Eb3cpB+AAAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6Y3JlYXRl ADIwMjItMDgtMTZUMTI6MDA6NTYrMDE6MDCRhRhWAAAAJXRFWHRkYXRlOm1vZGlmeQAyMDIxLTA1 LTE2VDA5OjU3OjA2KzAxOjAwTyZ6HwAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:240855 Archived-At: >>>>> Dmitry Gutov writes: > On 26.08.2022 14:11, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: >> Eli Zaretskii writes: >> >>> The only possible reason is that linum.el allows more freedom in >>> formatting the line numbers and their faces. I don't know >>> whether this reason is serious enough to not obsolete linum.el. >> I think nlinum is supposed to support everything that linum does >> (and is faster and less buggy) -- but I haven't looked in detail. > Here's one such case when I ended just just recommending to avoid > linum: > https://github.com/company-mode/company-mode/issues/1336 I've never experienced any problems with linum.el but then my setup is super-simple and does not include company-mode. Best wishes,