From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Visuwesh Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#50951: 28.0.50; Urdu text is not displayed correctly Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2022 16:41:54 +0530 Message-ID: <87edwijhc5.fsf@gmail.com> References: <83mtnsc63i.fsf@gnu.org> <83sfxjbox7.fsf@gnu.org> <87pmsnwlvo.fsf@igel.home> <837devbgrl.fsf@gnu.org> <8335pjbewj.fsf@gnu.org> <83zgrr9zn1.fsf@gnu.org> <87edwq7srx.fsf_-_@gnus.org> <87y1uy6mn5.fsf@zohomail.eu> <83wnaij974.fsf@gnu.org> <87tu5m6jrw.fsf@zohomail.eu> <835yhzifuw.fsf@gnu.org> <87o7vqxuvs.fsf@gmail.com> <87h71e5hro.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="17120"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: rahguzar@zohomail.eu, larsi@gnus.org, 50951@debbugs.gnu.org, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 11 13:13:15 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oXKtm-0004Fw-AN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2022 13:13:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37078 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oXKtl-00079z-DJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2022 07:13:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58908) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oXKta-000785-PN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2022 07:13:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:52189) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oXKta-0008Mj-GV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2022 07:13:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oXKta-0002wh-C7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2022 07:13:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Visuwesh Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2022 11:13:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50951 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 50951-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B50951.166289472611249 (code B ref 50951); Sun, 11 Sep 2022 11:13:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 50951) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Sep 2022 11:12:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40888 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oXKsg-0002vM-1Q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2022 07:12:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pf1-f194.google.com ([209.85.210.194]:42675) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oXKsd-0002ue-Ku for 50951@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 11 Sep 2022 07:12:04 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pf1-f194.google.com with SMTP id b23so5975225pfp.9 for <50951@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 11 Sep 2022 04:12:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=qv8PCPH7UibFiWPdco5X59G4ZZ5pgrVJBwk8bHq8x1E=; b=lDgoDpfTTXOAvfeI8D4KyvRNnrhgGFfwnuiLi5767c3vhjlLk/2Pvhe5VJ61nBuDV6 MHIDZ7Uf9W7lkj7Jahqmof0wdKCCUQibcJ5kixVmngNX87BCMb/gdVxhb1fw5lh6d5i0 N5DpPQScjjUUA2hKbces0UMdnQgxXr27PnQtx2M8A/QsWElO3MtrMYehPLmGjQSQG1/+ 3oAYxh8ym2eQiAoh6IaTdYsW6rxUglzQcbK7h8+onl1efgoWKvBrFpRCSzUVuJbkfbCw k2gKvg8JgkcCvPeQMnv6TQuz2cEL+GFvmRNqhFIKWk9BQKhGK4hvKGIt//yYbM3dRkR7 vUdw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date; bh=qv8PCPH7UibFiWPdco5X59G4ZZ5pgrVJBwk8bHq8x1E=; b=gs4zYzjxrXB7mHXdyr6Z7vpNp9zP6QiHQq5ahx9HnUGZuMhCuqSE+mYC5ST81fue5N hnAaSMRl7CBoAsJFpbMkI3e0DxvuOs4vsT8H0AHY7fbG39aIH4pBUZ0AFOoiZc76Re6C 4OnFCd2TGwyVDDty/C5Dd0JXO5P1oBJ7wiswMCJ+jkl3xtP4DosDZf1FCaAGn7eE+286 wblHR+DZsldU7MUTuLlIC5WpO6N30KQ0l/lmu+iUsHZgNfGX9FckyKeZHn/qFbymTtjW NOUaz2iKePhRDwJ0w2r87b0XuDImIK1zq+gFFK6cMiWnl+FHFnADwU+5/npAv2CSubYA g6tw== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo2XqzsTecWwwjC5ZVzGVxzG313Cz6I/oG/4x3ahgBEeiv0fUkv8 rg3C1FrvQf+AVEXD/A6O2vk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR5up+Nu4hUu12tFQDHlDrSfIaWvCFGSLFWqmDsyo5wHIGY1s9Eg7DaRjbrqAFIULZ5IuShl+g== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:2181:b0:51b:560b:dd30 with SMTP id h1-20020a056a00218100b0051b560bdd30mr23065748pfi.44.1662894717876; Sun, 11 Sep 2022 04:11:57 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost ([115.240.90.130]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h10-20020a170902680a00b0015e8d4eb1d5sm3739154plk.31.2022.09.11.04.11.56 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 11 Sep 2022 04:11:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87h71e5hro.fsf@gmail.com> (Visuwesh's message of "Sun, 11 Sep 2022 15:56:19 +0530") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:242145 Archived-At: [=E0=AE=9E=E0=AE=BE=E0=AE=AF=E0=AE=BF=E0=AE=B1=E0=AF=81 =E0=AE=9A=E0=AF=86= =E0=AE=AA=E0=AF=8D=E0=AE=9F=E0=AE=AE=E0=AF=8D=E0=AE=AA=E0=AE=B0=E0=AF=8D 11= , 2022] Visuwesh wrote: >> Not sure about Rah Guzar, but it squashes bug#54646 for me. Thank you >> so very much, Yamamoto Mitsuharu! > > Unfortunately, this turned out to be a false alarm. Before I could > easily reproduce the issue at will but now it is not so easy=E2=80=94the = fact > that it took me so long to notice that the bug is still present speaks > so. I was using patch no. 1 for the past days, I will try patch no. 2 > and see if it improves the situation. Patch no. 2 also exhibits the bug. I tried Rah Guzar's original test case given in [1] and [2] with the first and the second patch, and without any patches and I saw no mistakes in glyph placements. But of course, I cannot read Urdu so take this with a pound of salt... 1. https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D50951#11 2. https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D50951#26