From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ihor Radchenko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#59603: 28.1.90; `ucs-normalize-string' fails to work Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2022 10:16:12 +0000 Message-ID: <87edtqja1f.fsf@localhost> References: <87wn7ijef0.fsf@localhost> <83mt8et7na.fsf@gnu.org> <87sfi6jdd5.fsf@localhost> <83h6ymt6fs.fsf@gnu.org> <87pmdajbtg.fsf@localhost> <83edtqt49f.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="20324"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 59603@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 26 11:16:15 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oysEJ-00057G-7v for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2022 11:16:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oysEB-000603-GE; Sat, 26 Nov 2022 05:16:07 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oysE6-0005zj-S9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2022 05:16:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oysE6-00066O-Io for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2022 05:16:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oysE6-00046y-DR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2022 05:16:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Ihor Radchenko Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2022 10:16:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 59603 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 59603-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B59603.166945774715773 (code B ref 59603); Sat, 26 Nov 2022 10:16:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 59603) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Nov 2022 10:15:47 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37885 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oysDq-00046L-SN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2022 05:15:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:52793) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oysDo-000467-9t for 59603@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Nov 2022 05:15:45 -0500 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40566240101 for <59603@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 26 Nov 2022 11:15:37 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1669457738; bh=KOMVQgqjIop7+kxQTXBocrPiHlWHFDXQAfppsQ2gxa4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=BNwJCdC/tB+iPG12PKJp+d7BbKdqEwmQmFaEpN+jFTkrVR1JX96QKsMrDrw+Ov+9n yxZsazCurobQ55nRLseDzpGT2r4xm3tIqfRkzfQTpSG+XZQpASwz3BNDF8FPKIa4RU p8oDULALtHUXfmoDxoYUS/FiD3tIHIekuezhYpPtEOBG1foX8W9ldtk2YXbtTRZkNN j9ooEXr0TnWBxAd2xWI0nNNBiNQEB9EzTGZZRy/8rt7Jfz0B1Spf4Z0cxcx1ymRtxj PhSryRAmJZ9kPrhLYY0yMJ/xENegGGF8fFbV5nM21DHGKKBCGN75sTS8g3X8zDv2Xv uk8x2GiXPaaDQ== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4NK70S1C1Qz6tmb; Sat, 26 Nov 2022 11:15:33 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <83edtqt49f.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:249066 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> I do see that uppercase symbol names may not always refer to the >> arguments, but don't `str' fit better into the conventions? It is the >> symbol to be used in the macro, after all. >> Or do I miss something? > > How else do you suggest to indicate in the doc string that the macro > operates on a variable named 'str'? Using `str' is much more confusing, > IMO. We clearly disagree here. `str' would be more clear for me. Or explicitly saying that `str' symbol value is used. In any case, this is a very minor concern. I mostly tried to find if I am missing something in my understanding of documentation conventions. I have no strong feelings about this particular change. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at