From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#61489: [PATCH v2] Increase BLOCK_ALIGN from 1024 to 32768 Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 16:49:04 +0100 Message-ID: <87edqg8jrj.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20230216150755.27359-1-Hi-Angel@yandex.ru> <91c854289aa121d38d91699e976832e463ba90ba.camel@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="24392"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 61489@debbugs.gnu.org, 61490@debbugs.gnu.org To: Konstantin Kharlamov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 23 16:50:30 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pVDra-0006A6-Aw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 16:50:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pVDrB-0002Q7-C4; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 10:50:05 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pVDr9-0002Lu-AA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 10:50:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pVDr8-0002TR-EW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 10:50:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pVDr8-0000l6-9t for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 10:50:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Robert Pluim Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 15:50:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 61489 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 61489-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B61489.16771673572859 (code B ref 61489); Thu, 23 Feb 2023 15:50:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 61489) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Feb 2023 15:49:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35036 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pVDqO-0000jx-OV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 10:49:17 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-f49.google.com ([209.85.128.49]:39442) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pVDqM-0000jf-1o; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 10:49:14 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-f49.google.com with SMTP id o4-20020a05600c4fc400b003e1f5f2a29cso11015831wmq.4; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 07:49:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=nEy69gwNvKDHzesznljIL1u1CYoCAj8j1ZkqEccwLLI=; b=T7JkIPSIz7YFFgx3vqU2XtUTWN6aY0VRwLWDI8cLzc6mbHf7WNzk9IlR97LZy7RX8o k9gm4wzn+IVjSKQumWm9hJs1wTUkA+8kyBAnEIDszKqdXHM/q+y15fHJSt6mfeeaTpgS bBG9+oRJVLMkr90ovxELQ+ymaDlzgLQWffbh/RcWAxaCDU7aXkuxBMgoj0rSFh8uMD7H JK7qFaYQAve3MI3npY30Q97bZNBbT00eJdCpPG1e5crZgAI3KAXyaF3L7epMZjHi+J5a 8kg51FAuzDMNlrTXYIYLmHmgXNXEhvE3qqE8bIOrI5FS+QbKnXsB3vQzo1Ant67drtZr w2qA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=nEy69gwNvKDHzesznljIL1u1CYoCAj8j1ZkqEccwLLI=; b=XhQ9n20ff8WxsAVT6Fu9S88qGLA+EAwMaLR/NHYnb/wGB6xIoKfBpTOtpnpsQoYJbp M2IorgI296ywbscqVwBZ9kCNcIz9QjHz9ERcAFulbWONL74F4H/kxTTlNfwRoSjGY9Zz SBZM/t7FxsCCGwfnqs66RuG6t3KE412xJvHzxVkV7rJBuCKTwEiBwSRxXPU6JjeUpYcy 6A93KUwQRW5lnpJwLUJLR/q238eRK1PGfAVta2he9g9oBItA2iUPX9f6m7ozKe3NX+ed yXhvSxYrrqusRTCPhmoSREkRxtfmEHJSY4i7CbEIm1vggkSExvzYEzko0hcdN6AL+Izp j+xw== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKXJFSVedVLHPT4nbWPhCckHqU1qspF4sUspI+OHZjB8fNz52kHo YBBZ4TaA+cHYxtsdQrkdqOtz9gxXdWw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set8QdzD8VQRRnLZyR3PS5FZUuUj2RIoKngPMWiPCKnvhzHHgHKwz2iarMTCdrCGfYvx/oeITMQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:2ad6:b0:3e8:fade:3795 with SMTP id t22-20020a05600c2ad600b003e8fade3795mr4784051wme.17.1677167345949; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 07:49:05 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from rltb ([82.66.8.55]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id bl1-20020adfe241000000b002c54d8b89efsm11322992wrb.26.2023.02.23.07.49.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 23 Feb 2023 07:49:05 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <91c854289aa121d38d91699e976832e463ba90ba.camel@yandex.ru> (Konstantin Kharlamov's message of "Thu, 23 Feb 2023 18:30:00 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:256479 Archived-At: >>>>> On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 18:30:00 +0300, Konstantin Kharlamov said: Konstantin> So, it's been a week since version 2 was posted and 10-11 d= ays since I started Konstantin> using the change locally. Everything has been nice and dand= y, and in absence of Konstantin> further comments, I wonder if somebody with write permissio= ns could merge this Konstantin> patch? I=CA=BCve had no issues with it. Eli? Does this require 'Copyright-paperwor= k-exempt: yes'? Konstantin> P.S.: since there's a duplicate issues (one for the cover l= etter of the patch Konstantin> and another for the patch itself, I decided to add the seco= nd issue to CC). We can close 61489 or merge it with 61490. Probably the latter is best. Robert --=20