From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ihor Radchenko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#66020: (bug#64735 spin-off): regarding the default for read-process-output-max Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 17:15:46 +0000 Message-ID: <87ed931jul.fsf@localhost> References: <83bke5mhvs.fsf@gnu.org> <83a5tmk79p.fsf@gnu.org> <937d9927-506f-aa36-94e9-3cceb8f629dd@gutov.dev> <83zg1hay6q.fsf@gnu.org> <451d6012-e5ab-df6c-50e3-dac20b91781c@gutov.dev> <83led09dlk.fsf@gnu.org> <1d43341a-2e7c-9f1d-68e9-9bac6f4b5fba@gutov.dev> <838r8w3zr2.fsf@gnu.org> <868qzwwoif.fsf@gnu.org> <86o78bd473.fsf@gnu.org> <15f746d0-e635-47a0-a613-2ea31523966a@gutov.dev> <5922967c-1a6e-4b6e-b299-37fb598e5eca@gutov.dev> <86frtk6kfs.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="21408"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Dmitry Gutov , Eli Zaretskii , eggert@cs.ucla.edu, stefankangas@gmail.com, 66020-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 11 19:15:22 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sH55e-0005Hi-0v for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2024 19:15:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sH55O-0002ru-BP; Tue, 11 Jun 2024 13:15:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sH55M-0002rS-4T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2024 13:15:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sH55L-0004GX-Re for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2024 13:15:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sH55K-00063K-6D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2024 13:15:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Ihor Radchenko Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 17:15:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 66020 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 66020-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D66020.171812606123190 (code D ref 66020); Tue, 11 Jun 2024 17:15:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 66020-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jun 2024 17:14:21 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36210 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sH54e-00061x-MQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2024 13:14:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:57275) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sH54d-00061i-8G for 66020-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2024 13:14:19 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 474AF240101 for <66020-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 11 Jun 2024 19:14:13 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1718126054; bh=h0olI15o9U45nUwhJZrag992eTm9YElJETsvYtLQRaY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: From; b=V0Y3m6J09fh3+gac6SvWpV/EndaBAaBbwApwUWhKOEb1RkRjde1RjqLC/GtBmHYED t4qQuikGQiwWOfJtj/ZXYEsofnXQcpMgTX/56PsAYMyYZcnh0NMCwsdH/iI7q09BK8 hcp2DAvfxXWX81MiKU6zeG3DkHWR0VTwmSJAQhXz5fmnBgU9jOE4TfQomtsrFumUtZ KGiGoYpZoI7Kn015QFp99GdXlwkHi2TgcBcMFXpNJeDnN8YOmARmG4tsO+tJ9rB6AX WikTdHWcS7znC4Gw3QZdHOQrNwCir4wEOLmxvmXnWGRB7Ne9NJJrzhq0PJVx5CWuG3 /53/RRHfNiHMA== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4VzFdZ1RV8z6tvn; Tue, 11 Jun 2024 19:14:09 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:287103 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" writes: >> Technically, this is okay, but I'd like to hear from Stefan about >> whether it's correct to insert process output before the markers. > > AFAIK, when the insertion is done by the default process filter, it's > indeed done "before the markers". I have no idea why it's done this > way and would have preferred it to be different in many cases, but it's > been that way forever and changing it would inevitably break some code. FYI, I just upgraded to the latest master, and observed some lines in *Async-native-compile-log* inserted not at the end, but on the second line before last. Is it something others also see? -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at