From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: Re: Revisit file non-literally? (y or n) Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 07:19:26 +0900 Message-ID: <87d5dirmz5.fsf@catnip.gol.com> References: Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1149917452 4801 80.91.229.2 (10 Jun 2006 05:30:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 05:30:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 10 07:30:27 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fow3B-0002XF-Sp for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 07:30:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fow3B-0005tw-5L for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 01:30:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FopKG-00052T-LH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jun 2006 18:19:32 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FopKF-00052H-6L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jun 2006 18:19:32 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FopKE-00052E-UM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jun 2006 18:19:30 -0400 Original-Received: from [203.216.5.72] (helo=smtp02.dentaku.gol.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1FopSM-00023j-A0; Fri, 09 Jun 2006 18:27:54 -0400 Original-Received: from 203-216-98-193.dsl.gol.ne.jp ([203.216.98.193] helo=catnip.gol.com) by smtp02.dentaku.gol.com with esmtpa (Dentaku) id 1FopKA-00076r-Tl; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 07:19:27 +0900 Original-Received: by catnip.gol.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 937F62F56; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 07:19:26 +0900 (JST) Original-To: Dan Jacobson System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu In-Reply-To: (Dan Jacobson's message of "Thu, 08 Jun 2006 01:50:06 +0800") Original-Lines: 14 X-Abuse-Complaints: abuse@gol.com X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 01:30:19 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:15144 Archived-At: Dan Jacobson writes: > Revisit file non-literally? (y or n) > Please answer y or n. Revisit file non-literally? (y or n) [2 times] > > Why don't you add a third option, "?", that says what this is all > about, instead of confronting the user with a question he doesn't > understand that he must answer. I agree this would probably be a great feature, but it seems to be something for after-the-release. -Miles -- ((lambda (x) (list x x)) (lambda (x) (list x x)))