From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=93scar?= Fuentes Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7785: rgrep is broken on woe32 Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 02:05:27 +0100 Message-ID: <87d3oc17oo.fsf@telefonica.net> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1294190640 22641 80.91.229.12 (5 Jan 2011 01:24:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 01:24:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7785@debbugs.gnu.org To: Sam Steingold Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 05 02:23:55 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PaI6U-0008On-KE for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 02:23:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42345 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PaI6T-0003ni-T8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 20:23:53 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=34360 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PaI6O-0003nc-Ru for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 20:23:50 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PaI6N-00006N-ST for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 20:23:48 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:55136) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PaI6N-00006J-Oy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 20:23:47 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PaHiP-00028z-Vi; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 19:59:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=93scar?= Fuentes Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 00:59:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7785 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7785-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7785.12941891028196 (code B ref 7785); Wed, 05 Jan 2011 00:59:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7785) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jan 2011 00:58:22 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PaHhl-000289-Lw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 19:58:22 -0500 Original-Received: from impaqm4.telefonica.net ([213.4.138.20] helo=telefonica.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PaHhj-00027w-EP for 7785@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 19:58:20 -0500 Original-Received: from IMPmailhost4.adm.correo ([10.20.102.125]) by IMPaqm4.telefonica.net with bizsmtp id rd4q1f00K2iL0W23Qd5UHb; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 02:05:28 +0100 Original-Received: from qcore ([88.24.214.212]) by IMPmailhost4.adm.correo with BIZ IMP id rd5T1f0034bXV5U1kd5TAD; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 02:05:28 +0100 X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-original-sender: 981711563@telefonica.net In-Reply-To: (Sam Steingold's message of "Tue, 4 Jan 2011 18:47:40 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 19:59:01 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:43090 Archived-At: Sam Steingold writes: [snip] > /usr/bin/find: invalid expression; I was expecting to find a ')' > somewhere but did not see one. > > Grep finished with no matches found at Tue Jan 04 18:42:28 > ======================================= > > when I paste the above command into a cygwin shell window, it works > just fine (finds what I need). > i.e., the () in the command are actually well balanced. This looks like the string length restriction in cmdproxy.exe reported in http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=6674#74 It was patched, as indicated on the subsequent messages on that thread.