From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7777: 24.0.50; incompatible change for `directory-abbrev-alist' not in NEWS Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2011 17:01:47 -0500 Message-ID: <87d3o7kqb8.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <3F8051724A4D4413A7B4CCC51ADFC1F6@us.oracle.com> <83bp3xohvm.fsf@gnu.org> <2AFD6A500A684D38948C9F1EFE6CF6B3@us.oracle.com> <837helnwp5.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1294525472 19719 80.91.229.12 (8 Jan 2011 22:24:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2011 22:24:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7777@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 08 23:24:21 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PbhCo-00039H-2X for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Jan 2011 23:24:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44551 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PbhCn-00016v-EV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Jan 2011 17:24:13 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=53402 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PbhCg-00015h-AV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Jan 2011 17:24:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PbhCf-00089S-3N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Jan 2011 17:24:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:53292) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PbhCf-00089O-1n for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Jan 2011 17:24:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PbgkX-0004FX-Qi; Sat, 08 Jan 2011 16:55:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2011 21:55:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7777 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7777-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7777.129452366916285 (code B ref 7777); Sat, 08 Jan 2011 21:55:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7777) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Jan 2011 21:54:29 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pbgk0-0004Ec-FL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Jan 2011 16:54:28 -0500 Original-Received: from vm-emlprdomr-04.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.145]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pbgjz-0004ER-BJ for 7777@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Jan 2011 16:54:27 -0500 Original-Received: from furball (c-71-192-165-84.hsd1.ct.comcast.net [71.192.165.84]) (authenticated bits=0) by vm-emlprdomr-04.its.yale.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p08M1lB0023833 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 8 Jan 2011 17:01:47 -0500 Original-Received: by furball (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 37A6F161EAC; Sat, 8 Jan 2011 17:01:47 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Mon, 3 Jan 2011 20:12:33 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 130.132.50.145 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2011 16:55:01 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:43218 Archived-At: "Drew Adams" writes: > The other part of this bug is the location of the manual entry: Why > the Elisp manual? This is a user option. If we feel it is important > to tell users about this in a manual, why wouldn't the Emacs manual be > the right one? Sounds reasonable; I've done as suggested (and added the anchoring explanation).