From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs,gmane.emacs.devel Subject: bug#1580: zap-to-char too raw, or document Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 12:19:07 -0400 Message-ID: <87d3h3r4hw.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <87myeydbea.fsf@jidanni.org> <87tyahvvts.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1311265221 10786 80.91.229.12 (21 Jul 2011 16:20:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 16:20:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 1580@debbugs.gnu.org, jidanni@jidanni.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 21 18:20:16 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qjvyw-0003dt-Ea for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 18:20:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40123 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qjvyw-0002XA-1H for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 12:20:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:48239) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qjvyq-0002To-6h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 12:20:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qjvym-0000Ix-CD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 12:20:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:39607) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qjvym-0000Io-AL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 12:20:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qjvyk-0003Lu-Vj; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 12:20:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 16:20:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 1580 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 1580-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B1580.131126515912830 (code B ref 1580); Thu, 21 Jul 2011 16:20:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 1580) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jul 2011 16:19:19 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qjvy2-0003Kt-Sb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 12:19:19 -0400 Original-Received: from vm-emlprdomr-03.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.144]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qjvy0-0003Kf-Mi for 1580@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 12:19:17 -0400 Original-Received: from furball ([128.36.225.144]) (authenticated bits=0) by vm-emlprdomr-03.its.yale.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6LGJ755013588 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 21 Jul 2011 12:19:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Wed, 20 Jul 2011 22:09:35 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 130.132.50.144 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 12:20:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:49502 gmane.emacs.devel:142185 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: >> It's generally not worth it to add interactive codes for every >> conceivable operation. In this case, I think using read-char in the >> interactive form should work. > > Will `read-char' allow zapping to `C-g'? It doesn't seem to be > possible to say `C-q C-g'... I don't think it allows `C-q C-g', but it would allow using the input method, which is probably a more common need. I don't support any changes in this area until after the release, tho.