From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10714: SHR leaves too much trailing whitespace Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:07:30 +0100 Message-ID: <87d39qv24d.fsf@gnus.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1328645298 29005 80.91.229.3 (7 Feb 2012 20:08:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 20:08:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10714@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 07 21:08:17 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RurKq-0002FM-Cs for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:08:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41985 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RurKp-0001LE-Hr for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:08:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:36524) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RurKk-0001L6-48 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:08:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RurKf-0001GC-Go for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:08:10 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:55755) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RurKf-0001G7-F4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:08:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RurLa-0005pd-G7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:09:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:09:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10714 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed Original-Received: via spool by 10714-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10714.132864532622391 (code B ref 10714); Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:09:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10714) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Feb 2012 20:08:46 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59378 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RurLJ-0005p5-Gb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:08:45 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:44211) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RurLH-0005ox-8j for 10714@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:08:44 -0500 Original-Received: from 93-41-188-50.ip82.fastwebnet.it ([93.41.188.50] helo=rusty) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RurK8-0003fq-6J; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:07:32 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Mon, 06 Feb 2012 10:56:56 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130002 (Ma Gnus v0.2) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1RurK8-0003fq-6J MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1329250052.83114@3+DjOmIQIL1xhgAcI2UIcQ X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:56665 Archived-At: One thing just occurred to me. If you have something like
bla bla bla
that goes over several lines, that should be presented as a block with a red background. By just stripping all the white space, we instead get a ragged right, which is kinda ugly (and makes some tables less readable, if there are nested blocks). So I think the whitespace-stripping thing will have to be adjusted slightly, and only remove the whitespace if it actually makes the lines wider than the window is. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no * Sent from my Rome