From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stephen Berman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10907: 24.0.94; Updating display of Customize buffer Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:26:47 +0100 Message-ID: <87d38xbzaw.fsf@escher.home> References: <87vcmr6r9a.fsf@escher.home> <87obsj6l48.fsf@escher.home> <87k4367spn.fsf@escher.home> <87fwdu7qqb.fsf@escher.home> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1330518514 9181 80.91.229.3 (29 Feb 2012 12:28:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:28:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10907@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 29 13:28:33 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S2idw-0003DZ-D5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:28:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46953 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S2idv-00049o-Is for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 07:28:27 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49942) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S2idp-00048M-Du for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 07:28:25 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S2idi-0002ua-Ti for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 07:28:20 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:48400) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S2idi-0002uT-QW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 07:28:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S2idW-0005KR-Bf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 07:28:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stephen Berman Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:28:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10907 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10907-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10907.133051845020441 (code B ref 10907); Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:28:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10907) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Feb 2012 12:27:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55232 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S2icz-0005JT-KA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 07:27:29 -0500 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]:40713) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S2icd-0005Id-T9 for 10907@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 07:27:18 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 29 Feb 2012 12:26:48 -0000 Original-Received: from i59F55A45.versanet.de (EHLO escher.home) [89.245.90.69] by mail.gmx.net (mp016) with SMTP; 29 Feb 2012 13:26:48 +0100 X-Authenticated: #20778731 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19kQ4lzBxVki56Uk8ZwlvYF8FVfo7wxQjvjhVPjVc 3Am8eccp6nZPSc In-Reply-To: (Andreas Schwab's message of "Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:05:15 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.94 (gnu/linux) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:57395 Archived-At: On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:05:15 +0100 Andreas Schwab wrote: > Stefan Monnier writes: > >>> Ah, thanks. I feared as much. Is there really no way to reevaluate a >>> defcustom in a running Emacs? >> >> Agreed that there should be some way to have a defcustom type that is >> a bit more dynamic: no need to completely reevaluate the whole >> expression, but being able to have a dynamic set of `choice's would >> be helpful. > > Define a widget derived from menu-choice with custom :match and > :validate methods. Thanks for the suggestion; I'll try taking a stab at it, but with my level of competence and available time, it may take a while, if I succeed at all (if anyone else beats me to the punch, please let know). Steve Berman