From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nix Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16093: 24.3.50; Crash of emacs --daemon on killing X server Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 22:35:13 +0000 Message-ID: <87d2l01ise.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> References: <87siu2uics.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> <52A604A7.6010104@yandex.ru> <8738m0s2bu.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> <52A7E9D9.3060306@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1386974176 27876 80.91.229.3 (13 Dec 2013 22:36:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 22:36:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16093@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dmitry Antipov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 13 23:36:20 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VrbLF-0004sU-GI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 23:36:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45007 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VrbLF-00065S-45 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 17:36:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35309) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VrbL6-00065N-Ld for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 17:36:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VrbL0-00054e-NE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 17:36:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:34913) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VrbL0-00054Y-Js for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 17:36:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VrbL0-0001yz-7m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 17:36:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Nix Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 22:36:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16093 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16093-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16093.13869741197569 (code B ref 16093); Fri, 13 Dec 2013 22:36:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16093) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Dec 2013 22:35:19 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48932 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VrbKI-0001y1-Sl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 17:35:19 -0500 Original-Received: from icebox.esperi.org.uk ([81.187.191.129]:32955 helo=mail.esperi.org.uk) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VrbKG-0001xr-6U for 16093@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 17:35:17 -0500 Original-Received: from spindle.srvr.nix (nix@spindle.srvr.nix [192.168.14.15]) by mail.esperi.org.uk (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rBDMZDfi003555; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 22:35:13 GMT Emacs: ... it's not just a way of life, it's a text editor! In-Reply-To: <52A7E9D9.3060306@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Antipov's message of "Wed, 11 Dec 2013 08:28:09 +0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-DCC-dcc1-Metrics: spindle 1182; Body=3 Fuz1=3 Fuz2=3 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:81913 Archived-At: On 11 Dec 2013, Dmitry Antipov told this: > > On 12/11/2013 04:20 AM, Glenn Morris wrote: > >> Time to bisect, then! > > Don't. This is r114797. Oh yes, that's a smoking gun all right. I concur that *not* freeing fonts at some point is a gigantic leak, though. Am I right to assume that bug 16128 is the same bug, and that this is thus fixed by r115505? Or does r115506 indicate that you've been forced to let this leak stand? :( -- NULL && (void)