From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18891: Doesn't handle pwd = /C: very well Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 20:56:06 +0100 Message-ID: <87d291l8vd.fsf@gmx.de> References: <87d293dtc5.fsf@gmx.de> <83lhnqvqt9.fsf@gnu.org> <87y4rpvqgz.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1415217447 12277 80.91.229.3 (5 Nov 2014 19:57:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 19:57:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 18891@debbugs.gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 05 20:57:20 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xm6hj-0007oo-4P for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 20:57:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48287 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xm6hi-0004AB-Px for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 14:57:18 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46682) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xm6hY-00041X-9z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 14:57:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xm6hS-0003uv-EL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 14:57:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:53192) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xm6hS-0003un-Bc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 14:57:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xm6hR-0008BI-W4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 14:57:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Albinus Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 19:57:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18891 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 18891-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18891.141521737131384 (code B ref 18891); Wed, 05 Nov 2014 19:57:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18891) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Nov 2014 19:56:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50405 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xm6gd-0008A7-9u for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 14:56:11 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:64957) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Xm6gb-00089z-42 for 18891@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 14:56:10 -0500 Original-Received: from detlef.gmx.de ([87.146.42.181]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LbMF8-1YRGGq3mCQ-00kuTw; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 20:56:07 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Wed, 05 Nov 2014 14:45:36 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:fU3GrzRhI1Ouqukv9mEe+MtHoxYg2shhaoQF1zHTuulQWp6eID2 bxPT0puMnmfUCuFYTKuMGYU+jhlCd0/UKXDw+rSKPJ/uwkl0kP16bRpe4EnUvwsEpImIE1R 5yPe12e3gpuJQGhmpvkZBHp+7145PlCjI0ucWO08mCCdSUoikIYjOs8kY/fkyqU3iFsFhMJ su/UgrO6XBmg5YrBe0XwQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:95573 Glenn Morris writes: > PS this makes me think, what happens if the local file name happens to > match a remote host that does exist... > > If as you say the design prefers remote hosts over local ones, that > seems like a bad design to me. Don't blame me, the design seems to be older than my liaison with Emacs (ange-ftp.el is copyrighted since 1989; I've started with Emacs in autumn 1990, IIRC). You have the same problem with other file name handlers. If you work on a file foo.gpg, epa-file-handler will be invoked just because of this name. It doesn't matter, whether taht file is encrypted with gpg, or not. Best regards, Michael.