From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19328: [PATCH] Add mechanism to prompt about unsaved customizations Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 20:17:26 -0500 Organization: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=A2=D0=B5=D0=BE=D0=B4=D0=BE=D1=80_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=97=D0=BB=D0=B0=D1=82=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=BE=D0=B2?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87d27o1h7d.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87egs7a5b0.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1418433442 14503 80.91.229.3 (13 Dec 2014 01:17:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2014 01:17:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 19328@debbugs.gnu.org To: Cameron Desautels Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 13 02:17:16 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XzbKd-000204-Sb for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 Dec 2014 02:17:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59956 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XzbKd-0003wk-Aw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 20:17:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36358) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XzbKW-0003wY-2b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 20:17:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XzbKQ-0004EX-Te for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 20:17:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:34925) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XzbKQ-0004ET-O5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 20:17:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XzbKQ-0003uG-Bu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 20:17:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Ted Zlatanov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2014 01:17:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19328 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 19328-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19328.141843339914981 (code B ref 19328); Sat, 13 Dec 2014 01:17:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19328) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Dec 2014 01:16:39 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44291 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XzbK3-0003tY-8s for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 20:16:39 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-qg0-f51.google.com ([209.85.192.51]:46277) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XzbK1-0003tM-4I for 19328@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 20:16:37 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-qg0-f51.google.com with SMTP id e89so6360788qgf.10 for <19328@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 17:16:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lifelogs.com; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:organization:references:mail-copies-to :gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent :mime-version:content-type; bh=45NBeDF1J0hZy3i96Utmf1lMcBlXNUmm+Eyo1X9z1AM=; b=pCijbDu7zf1l7PY0ePurpVlN9SSDIHyRuEDpXnR5Ju3askmetjr+oPUvy8I+3cEV/c Bk0wuVD8FjE7wnU0fkkvPgYmUPExS/Ri6NFy764/z8WXH3LSnT0+5pighvFaVYY3Cmt5 fvnRTKLQpm5TkphapBhC41KxKG4epewy5W64Y= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:organization:references :mail-copies-to:gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=45NBeDF1J0hZy3i96Utmf1lMcBlXNUmm+Eyo1X9z1AM=; b=WuuFji+1X9zpYG1nk827feBdv4k82yHh5j+8s3QJCMlzxdKhjPdx9/JenrM4GkADdZ 1cK2g0d8zo5smiOUYP1poAaXPf8WBXaj4ciSBOWyDkHR375YtAPkAVWvFc//yhGD0Ykl Nw5RTwbntOBQnJIVrKvCCP6rvLd9XcZ+KcDiH0uRMpUVMYQJUBeZHMCIMwEguZKmk4H8 QPWARHStKemAesbHdVRz9C5D2F+GKBeaT+VvgBlzXmnpJElo2llvZYD+mDfOhZcxTEUW YbXx85cCU3NSdc3TCFOP8C9UtF+k/p2ZKOB2SLAyY5jCLmVhnIyahVf4MCfG0yFLzouT 26KA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnkzMKuyOyUegOPjx5jlFk4o/09R7x28JFEDYxY3+ZGY2Z5c+m3j973o32nlfMT4+OSXx5A X-Received: by 10.224.37.67 with SMTP id w3mr36790076qad.88.1418433391745; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 17:16:31 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from flea (c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [98.229.61.72]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id e7sm3045460qag.49.2014.12.12.17.16.30 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 12 Dec 2014 17:16:30 -0800 (PST) X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes In-Reply-To: (Cameron Desautels's message of "Thu, 11 Dec 2014 20:39:39 -0600") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:97278 Archived-At: On Thu, 11 Dec 2014 20:39:39 -0600 Cameron Desautels wrote: CD> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 8:36 PM, Stefan Monnier CD> wrote: >> Oh yes, I'm quite aware of this problem, which is why I think this >> feature is very nice and that's also why I'm saying that I'm not >> necessarily opposed to enabling it by default. >> >> But I'd like to some opinion from people who've actually tried it. >> >> Many Emacs users can have very strong reactions to very small changes in >> the default behavior. The potential benefit justifies a bit of >> potential annoyance, and I think I can evaluate the potential benefit, >> but I don't think I can evaluate the potential annoyance yet. CD> Got it. Seems like a wise approach. Let me know how I can help. To make it easier for people to try it, and to format the patch a little better, I've pushed it on top of the current master branch in the branch scratch/bug19328/custom-prompt-customize-unsaved-options from where it can be tried or cherry-picked. Ted