From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: nljlistbox2@gmail.com (N. Jackson) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23039: 25.0.92; New Emacs icon blurry in GNOME on Fedora Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 08:56:15 -0300 Message-ID: <87d1qof3j4.fsf@gmail.com> References: <8737rpjh5r.fsf@gmail.com> <87fuvk2prg.fsf@petton.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1458561545 30373 80.91.229.3 (21 Mar 2016 11:59:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 11:59:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 23039@debbugs.gnu.org To: Nicolas Petton Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 21 12:58:56 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ahyU3-0005m3-UC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 12:58:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57150 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ahyU3-0007k8-JA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 07:58:55 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59942) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ahyTB-0006Tq-IB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 07:58:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ahySE-0002oS-9E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 07:58:01 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:59159) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ahySE-0002oA-3C for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 07:57:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ahySD-0002Li-Na for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 07:57:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: nljlistbox2@gmail.com (N. Jackson) Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 11:57:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23039 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 23039-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23039.14585613858980 (code B ref 23039); Mon, 21 Mar 2016 11:57:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23039) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Mar 2016 11:56:25 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56286 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ahyRd-0002Kl-1f for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 07:56:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-io0-f173.google.com ([209.85.223.173]:36042) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ahyRb-0002KY-WC for 23039@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 07:56:24 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-io0-f173.google.com with SMTP id 124so54119513iov.3 for <23039@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 04:56:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=x7yQCZ8SQCbMUrbGh1wEQ8fg0ZrSk2gPtSNEIs+0rwE=; b=C30xULiUiC1cvCbbKdvI791on/BSwZbIZhsAUDDGfuORiw4zkDV/quRE5vbDRfyvdy yO0MpIYefO+TtJz/NVh7/tEnrXsjFf7lNAOQkuC2SkBRQQMoB3SLZQPskr0oKW3NZpci UdshRVJe9NgMkPd22694dQvbVZZ/SH6QjVCo6bFx+Snp+cSOYTPMUVO6RIfuq5SZ9Sl8 wg9n3ucDIzzFo/GZMKWUDXXVvKe9cZvYkcbx+MiqIStTwriHR/b0WYyekIOcufUrxdS4 cDk4l3YbTad/dktV2VClAaRxne5+IGAengkMxmOM5YiN4T0KpHS3wCGFsRsEAkatZYqC tE2Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=x7yQCZ8SQCbMUrbGh1wEQ8fg0ZrSk2gPtSNEIs+0rwE=; b=IkeMjqBa5dxpARvE+t9n5cbAYlGJEq05E3EksY9hFbWtZ+ybTTk03+ml84QGTrzDWx rRxquSO3IgpOaPHjgj2UO9BDib3ZNw0R7zUDSk5so83+raAlzV/r5fim20yto1Vlc5gF rzRuHN03nVI4mLScR+Wz3Wr1xOk35w0ncQWX3Z4kaDPFJVVD9RO3DJOPqq/AxuZ4eVFc 6JPZ1lZHr/0WSCOv2pTXE8Ao68JEnq6HBzI91AYDDwX6OZgQ6Om6Tl4Q9Ra7M9ohkv02 VRuJlyMpcom+Ixvu2yAF72btGoBc93ZqZQ9AImQJpCt9KWaGeaYvQOe52rz+RQUoMvVx 4Fig== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJL1fX7GcHlBH29OVqupojw4sX4UyzvBlR2bj1pBPuGZg9qHtMGy7+PuQuACqxz4UA== X-Received: by 10.107.19.164 with SMTP id 36mr31887356iot.24.1458561378263; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 04:56:18 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from moondust.nodomain.none (T870A.WPA.Dal.Ca. [134.190.135.10]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x9sm5162167igg.17.2016.03.21.04.56.16 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 21 Mar 2016 04:56:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87fuvk2prg.fsf@petton.fr> (Nicolas Petton's message of "Mon, 21 Mar 2016 09:34:27 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:115220 Archived-At: At 09:34 +0100 on Monday 2016-03-21, Nicolas Petton wrote: > "N. Jackson" writes: >> >> The new Emacs icon is displayed with a fuzzy out-of-focus appearance. > > I cannot reproduce the issue, using a fresh Fedora 23 box, and > installing the latest pretest (25.0.92). > > I attached screenshots of the icon in GNOME. Hi Nico, Yes, that looks very nice on your system. Can you tell me the correct steps to get the new icon to be used, and at the correct resolution? Initially when I built the pretests from the tarballs and ran Emacs 25 from the src/ directory I was still seeing the old icon. To get the new icon to show up I did a make install (to prefix=~/local/) but that was not sufficient (and possibly not necessary). Then I un-installed the Fedora-supplied Emacs package (from which, I believe, the old icons were being picked up), and after that I had the new icon, but fuzzy, as shown in my screenshot in my initial bug report. My PATH has /usr/bin and /usr/local/bin before ~/local/bin, which possibly explains that. But I'm not sure if it's relevant because I'm not familiar with the workings of how GNOME picks up the icons for a binary. The new icons seem to be installed to both ~/local/share/emacs/25.0.92/etc/images/icons/hicolor/ and to ~/local/share/icons/hicolor/ -- should they be in both? Thanks. Regards, N.