From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stephen Berman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23746: 25.0.95; Doc fixes (grammar, typos, clarification) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 18:32:57 +0200 Message-ID: <87d1nnofd2.fsf@gmx.net> References: <87h9czoh5v.fsf@gmx.net> <83d1nnhfmu.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1465662876 17317 80.91.229.3 (11 Jun 2016 16:34:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 16:34:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 23746@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 11 18:34:24 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bBlrW-0008A9-Va for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 18:34:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47769 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bBlrW-0005xV-Bx for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 12:34:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46035) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bBlrP-0005v8-IU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 12:34:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bBlrL-0005sr-AH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 12:34:10 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:53272) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bBlrL-0005sn-6h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 12:34:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bBlrF-0000tk-VX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 12:34:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stephen Berman Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 16:34:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23746 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 23746-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23746.14656627883375 (code B ref 23746); Sat, 11 Jun 2016 16:34:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23746) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jun 2016 16:33:08 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37376 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bBlqN-0000sN-Qv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 12:33:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:50353) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bBlqL-0000rs-Qc for 23746@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 12:33:06 -0400 Original-Received: from rosalinde ([89.245.73.202]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MhQju-1aqNMu3j2w-00Mfa8; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 18:32:59 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83d1nnhfmu.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 11 Jun 2016 19:08:57 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.95 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:Bw+2WrGGXVIOTOrUPXCQqHTuH0SUNJ6mmLckJvumqVSUeK0+7ck V3UZIncgFVj3HmL/qaWBiLeMV/NcsWZfMp+ZYSH8nxVRMCwia5J/qHxJiMbN6a8akxauDQn mz3ViWF/U17G5oDkghUkeG5PYWwl0FvHKv0ogmsmES9hKH2piD/3NmEf+cnEUV3x2A6rrwM weHkXngcunA0GzcuYvxSQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:zUNt2hhMKBo=:RWJ/svvGoBcdXln0DEv1vf HFhCISFuxxyo6ql79JZokOfLttq5X4iPf4jwKZILzv5fkuf3vKGXFUVoC2dbSb+qZ6k7UcSlc 5lLAAD8elVjqJXXhFGErOmeux1UAzLb8NShVDLLhKwZurL35ahuj9s/5KFvx93TWvHMNzQMhf PM02nkaHoKiP5+laUfs0RLa31+3mf/buHACITTFACX/emzODsV6aZb9OFUkLNYW96uRfnPyDn tv1wlxVF/VIi4FUicPNvX5BierbWp2KjByhXqDqKbsnbYCPDCg8egCUEqdnnE6sLORkc/OX+q 1oENKVWWUWoVyre2l+UUhJ1f8FdfYtic9LewU+NG0gi8c696y0KVY7XKjBMPNk+aKdJtuOuH4 +7z1tmgtbOTzmCok3oTDymtzgRsbwvgDY1S4Ia5I7xHsBjKOnl0WGq3xWHE9kbtps6Jie7VSF ySHyGJE0RGN0tdn0aDBslMkOPR3Kypr+TFNoGjwgBXhfbzmL05osbRNC1h2d83LSJbpfvCQh8 XK7HdcRp69oAuqWIwF/CoQJyacn5AyTpV5kkl3QqPEQmIGj3bKzrwm5xuFK00gjxAjV0909GN /4OKZGexfoKyaZaVd+89tvC68tby0krYcS2E4w80NyoCEbI30TRSFEEOOD79OgBdVHWjf4GIl N0pKI9plwHfKReOHwqKk8CbdlNrSOhcV+TiOm+hMXQnkos2HVmm7bZGZFWSl94uu6o39Wk1L2 KZYmzcwEzzZ7zMAN7coyq9H3hBd6EahW7aYjlzL9lOIjM2KuqFXx8sZkGNVOxY22krkt3xST X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:119429 Archived-At: On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 19:08:57 +0300 Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Stephen Berman >> Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 17:54:04 +0200 >> >> In GNU Emacs 25.0.95.1 (x86_64-suse-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.14.15) >> of 2016-06-11 built on rosalinde >> Repository revision: 6921f4a5961fb53f8fb24d1a5a3f94266f990f6e > > Thanks. Please go ahead and push to the release branch, with the > following 2 exceptions: [...] >> @@ -1382,12 +1382,13 @@ Process Buffers >> @end defun >> >> If the process's buffer is displayed in a window, your Lisp program >> -may wish telling the process the dimensions of that window, so that ^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> -the process could adapt its output to those dimensions, much as it ^^^^^ >> -adapts to the screen dimensions. The following functions allow to ^^^^^^^^ >> -communicate this kind of information to processes; however, not all ^^^^^^^^^^^ >> -systems support the underlying functionality, so it is best to provide >> -fallbacks, e.g., via command-line arguments or environment variables. >> +may wish to tell the process the dimensions of that window, so that ^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> +the process can adapt its output to those dimensions, much as it ^^^ >> +adapts to the screen dimensions. The following functions allow your ^^^^^^^^^^ >> +program to communicate this kind of information to processes; however, ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> +not all systems support the underlying functionality, so it is best to >> +provide fallbacks, e.g., via command-line arguments or environment >> +variables. > > This goes against the rest of the changes, which correctly made the > opposite replacement. I see no reason to make the opposite change > here. I don't understand what you mean; the changes in that hunk are strictly grammatical corrections (underlined). Steve Berman