From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: nljlistbox2@gmail.com (N. Jackson) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25851: 25.2; GTK warning when starting Emacs when desktop file has more than one frame Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 15:16:37 -0500 Message-ID: <87d1e0iwgq.fsf@moondust.localdomain> References: <87a89c51qb.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <831suoub86.fsf@gnu.org> <87lgswmi6a.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <83vas0rozb.fsf@gnu.org> <87k28fso3o.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <83o9xrsmrd.fsf@gnu.org> <874lzjsh8t.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <87y3wvqqos.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <83fuj2smzr.fsf@gnu.org> <87wpccmv71.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <87d1e4mq48.fsf@moondust.localdomain> <83innvppz4.fsf@gnu.org> <58B546EE.2030500@gmx.at> <831suipb3r.fsf@gnu.org> <58B5C4A1.6050601@gmx.at> <83shmyno97.fsf@gnu.org> <58B6866B.2040307@gmx.at> <83fuixnf7l.fsf@gnu.org> <58B722AA.4090501@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1488399435 30253 195.159.176.226 (1 Mar 2017 20:17:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 20:17:15 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) Cc: 25851@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 01 21:17:10 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cjAgL-0006t5-LW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 21:17:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48587 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cjAgR-0003vc-Nk for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 15:17:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46832) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cjAgL-0003vW-Cb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 15:17:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cjAgI-0008V7-1K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 15:17:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:36666) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cjAgH-0008V2-Tm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 15:17:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cjAgH-0000s9-MU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 15:17:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: nljlistbox2@gmail.com (N. Jackson) Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 20:17:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25851 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 25851-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25851.14883994113334 (code B ref 25851); Wed, 01 Mar 2017 20:17:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25851) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Mar 2017 20:16:51 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34865 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cjAg7-0000ri-8O for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 15:16:51 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-io0-f196.google.com ([209.85.223.196]:35198) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cjAg5-0000rV-Kh for 25851@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 15:16:49 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-io0-f196.google.com with SMTP id f103so1277455ioi.2 for <25851@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 12:16:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=JKgpiwrwp2k0ORSQIqkZ2mf3CjAeRc5PXYxwLbTfo/o=; b=UslvntM2eAgudSUGR2EJ91H6hNh3vt/mDWWANej7dbVw2WtLaNWVsMaAUXthQddbEK L7Cz7YS4ZOa1Wal44nvITE3Mqp0eTbFM7i8lOLyKhqYflGYCl4vwOgjVK1hgF+4dyQAk EHoIW811cXY2wUk3uX1kmQaXQBNn0fXjC5f5fdpPWzExoCyuVU5cIxSH4XlzFDj98bx4 3wuJd8OXd9l7SciGUzvhKNJFAjfp0e+nEJD+BaZAK+a46Pyx3P4M8oWwAi79do7KJG/0 H1N9BcCpeKoosx3WKyVBB79977LB+BC8yTJE/75337bWl3GjrkB0VWWECCUoavBBl4Aj M4EQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=JKgpiwrwp2k0ORSQIqkZ2mf3CjAeRc5PXYxwLbTfo/o=; b=WDEtGHaX3NvjOaTLPR+m0LKUm672oUoeWVuudoYPx0+oIcwSdG8zAOK3vVmNW7rVoI tB0hj/jCVrr8forh9L8332bHgQq8sddF9S2EOaiFpOYoWI6Njnm3HM2nEX2gCfpEnoqF 69TnnUTADc1XtsV/LV+Au56q18wUzze5zHxnCIKvbOboEYyPZGpq5UQkeUeEm3+t7Nqa 6dqd8NJHtjR+IHWSatyxM6FXmmpTbZD7cFG5WXs7owRMUWO1PbD0yS8F8Q7s4XZDHQDj D7j/b8txDbaa/cockM7O1IDEIsUD3+x/GOG/OY8Xdi9zc2zJa/Y+6swDcsbbt23JCvcE IlJw== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39mKj/z9ZAzOjs94iysxhK0Fks+WfRZCglXrQh3SBPa+FBBZ/sc2j0DnyDq959Pxvw== X-Received: by 10.107.134.94 with SMTP id i91mr10327637iod.0.1488399404093; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 12:16:44 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from moondust.localdomain.nodomain.none ([72.143.113.194]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l5sm7344098ita.13.2017.03.01.12.16.43 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 01 Mar 2017 12:16:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <58B722AA.4090501@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Wed, 01 Mar 2017 20:36:10 +0100") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:130006 Archived-At: At 20:36 +0100 on Wednesday 2017-03-01, martin rudalics wrote: >> If that's the reason, and we think doing that is legitimate, is >> there any other solution but to shut up the warning? > > I think that warning is legitimate. And even if I thought that > what we are doing is legitimate - xfwm would still refuse to put > the top-left corner of my new frame off-screen. I'm not quite following this discussion. [Of course, it isn't important that I follow it; however if you have time to elucidate, I would much appreciate it.] If we removed the arguably illegitimate chicanery, what functionality, specifically, would be lost? Might it be achieved in a more straightforward way?