From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#26624: 26.0.50; Generalized variable `buffer-local-value' does't restore local flag Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2017 13:43:20 -0400 Message-ID: <87d16gm1qf.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> References: <87zid6udys.fsf@drachen> <87o9q0m77u.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1506275053 16231 195.159.176.226 (24 Sep 2017 17:44:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2017 17:44:13 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.60 (gnu/linux) Cc: Michael Heerdegen , 26624@debbugs.gnu.org To: Philipp Stephani Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 24 19:44:10 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dwAwp-0003ru-J8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Sep 2017 19:44:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38918 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dwAww-00075F-Q2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Sep 2017 13:44:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59158) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dwAwn-00075A-T2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Sep 2017 13:44:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dwAwk-00037N-RC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Sep 2017 13:44:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:47715) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dwAwk-00037D-NI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Sep 2017 13:44:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dwAwk-0007Mu-Dk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Sep 2017 13:44:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2017 17:44:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 26624 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 26624-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B26624.150627500928273 (code B ref 26624); Sun, 24 Sep 2017 17:44:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 26624) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Sep 2017 17:43:29 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56396 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dwAwD-0007Lx-Kt for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Sep 2017 13:43:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-it0-f48.google.com ([209.85.214.48]:44741) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dwAwB-0007Li-QU for 26624@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Sep 2017 13:43:28 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-it0-f48.google.com with SMTP id d192so4362514itd.1 for <26624@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 24 Sep 2017 10:43:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yVrpAdVIeL6ngohBrElec7Kq6qgHLV7xvIpJf7CNxjM=; b=gk3ZPY0qd9ZSu23a7Er0KpKk46vl8Fv6gQU2vFeJ7IDTVNIJ4Wowui8erNVFbw9/0a Oe4LZMj2rJUx5QyJ/vl+35juUwB3/zf0bP2vfhCQrWNB64USr1+zq7t1MnGbcaZjK8Gc Q2MGV8oHA3MknsGJg60WZO8Ad0jdCfw8sxgCk411kahH5tXXqB4HMwpxD9jBQnnx4RsP vcLJ/ukRJwfQ+RkEuaZp+Gi1/nThNMtsMA0rju53W4Qpahcv2WEepuJlgI6CGAxOz8SV AtBjdGlN8K3mOvsU0iR+sB5vJyZKlbdpZqUkcUNEYVmbJHk0pGBlk9WNUTf2z8UZSh7/ HPbQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=yVrpAdVIeL6ngohBrElec7Kq6qgHLV7xvIpJf7CNxjM=; b=OMok9lrcOSHbQ2zf+HySbspbjjfMkHgt2Y/LseQuCHmHBCafmWQ78Ca+BNUF9bGYKu BcmTcjEZA5VSlfn89IkW7Fen1xp8dYjRBiWz55/xtxbkJFWw0NcA5SSoEFrVbtozBh25 bf6OAo+hOBrdD+fKmzfGytCrPcKchwNRGW4sa8QewKe6y97K8JVNhgQnt57cK38VMdFG RnobrNU5YLz4/Pp7Fdj7UQbPrdleDy7s1ZsFo+HQOk/aWbhxr19LiZv5cbzyCZWEWzy0 enEfGPH58u/ZwQ631q/fZJuv1VxAnCTN22KY77jvj+TTaAxr7ztHryegYMZ7tEvJm454 ZBnQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUjrcx9qCkYBqtFHqXWwdtcwJ/oZmaOsK8nqv2d8lTxDx9XSkY9h Gnwpd2OUFF05qjGSqfd6NVCjww== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QDFNL6diuGtvvhWTfmoOEHdHF5TjAbjPlweYVEam8QrynTJgToEfLo0XE3vZDGsPChp8mZavA== X-Received: by 10.36.6.18 with SMTP id 18mr16342860itv.15.1506275002178; Sun, 24 Sep 2017 10:43:22 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from zebian ([45.2.119.34]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id k133sm2508750itd.0.2017.09.24.10.43.21 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sun, 24 Sep 2017 10:43:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Philipp Stephani's message of "Sun, 24 Sep 2017 16:42:12 +0000") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:137351 Archived-At: Philipp Stephani writes: > Noam Postavsky schrieb am So., 24. > Sep. 2017 um 17:44=C2=A0Uhr: > > Philipp Stephani writes: >=20=20=20=20 > > * lisp/emacs-lisp/gv.el (buffer-local-value): Remove. >=20=20=20=20 > Is it possible to just give an obsolete warning first? > > > I don't think it's possible in the sense of `make-obsolete' because > the expander is not a named function. > It would be possible to use `display-warning' within the body of the > setter, but that would only annoy users. > If necessary, we might add additional code to the `setf' macro to > warn about this form in particular during byte compilation. IMO, a compilation warning would be appropriate.