From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#28597: 26.0.60; [Security] Configure should use --without-pop by default Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2017 17:03:48 +0200 Message-ID: <87d164l1d7.fsf@gmail.com> References: <837ewh8x5z.fsf@gnu.org> <87r2upd2h5.fsf@gmail.com> <83a81d7666.fsf@gnu.org> <87h8vl1db2.fsf@gmail.com> <873771wm1y.fsf@gmail.com> <87vajwvej8.fsf@gmail.com> <83poa41erm.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1507043067 15220 195.159.176.226 (3 Oct 2017 15:04:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2017 15:04:27 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.60 (gnu/linux) Cc: jwiegley@gmail.com, eggert@cs.ucla.edu, 28597@debbugs.gnu.org, nljlistbox2@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 03 17:04:13 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dzOjz-0002T4-6J for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Oct 2017 17:04:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59035 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dzOk3-000622-PG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Oct 2017 11:04:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38120) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dzOju-00061t-Qr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Oct 2017 11:04:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dzOjq-0005cd-SG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Oct 2017 11:04:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:37806) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dzOjq-0005cT-OF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Oct 2017 11:04:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dzOjq-0005oR-AN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Oct 2017 11:04:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Robert Pluim Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2017 15:04:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28597 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 28597-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B28597.150704304122336 (code B ref 28597); Tue, 03 Oct 2017 15:04:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 28597) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Oct 2017 15:04:01 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46487 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dzOjp-0005oC-Cm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Oct 2017 11:04:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-f47.google.com ([74.125.82.47]:46306) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dzOjn-0005nz-Ov for 28597@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Oct 2017 11:04:00 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-f47.google.com with SMTP id m72so17397413wmc.1 for <28597@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 03 Oct 2017 08:03:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=L/rsLndFuDJfb4VmjkTqmQbMZLjR0IjOnOUPhwscqe8=; b=ubyDZHthwvMqbj9oFU1QR10XBa+KVqopOgV6JU1C+BfpS4JrF7VAz94ioAHI1HdgOh X3rkLxYIjEgtcAS1bNPq39ZwrvCEtImppz1lRL19RlZ/vkjIWUUzugoBbYzWhviJpfy9 w6B+irQPMC/WTlK5ebmI+U92fcAEpmMlknIes+uHDLYskjMRu67LsriBE24Xn47dCJXe Pt3bm+9bFfe99BikEQkPqoVPIpr71OBVjg+YSFIbW7HkXICRvBKDUmKu/6RHCF1Dmf7q koO7ZELT5yfs1ckudr4I7ekkEVetj7/xO9iiz/nQ//nh5hXi4N106oytLV/xrtp8VgDc nTuw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references :gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent :mime-version; bh=L/rsLndFuDJfb4VmjkTqmQbMZLjR0IjOnOUPhwscqe8=; b=Vn+tbnD0EEypxJk5nP/7CO8rJ78InMQwBB0lUlAySvOZvwXrmWQZsVfBlj81RwrTV0 rtarZoGj9dcW3dYLzc1k/OTLaGRsm9PGjh7mrSQbQOra32rZvpNLf+rmqA11lA/gbfNE T/RmYBiXfS6HDMHzAEJELelN2ewHRlvVKbkLuA34XXItAffSuclrSAmV/xyuHBI++kPd llhwsylpJBwwksu8qC6Jip6fni7PeCf4cK4iGe6d5OVxUxL9wzjYUxh72S145wV017L3 DmSuLgcbn27o0SXIKCAC/Ulyv5XCAj053AUeIpn4hQoSGAxmEHu/l70FWFS50it6FdHp veqw== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUgzgvF9VG77mfOhewUi3epo86Og/hYF5A5mO6DA+fRzUUj5uMGx yoQMlnyCNOOdKJXWApVDBlE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QBXC3PofROB/evIgt2RuMyx0lbPFfC6mQNcedlIZVWk+Dvuyirm9BLct2o/HsRm4VI6tQshUw== X-Received: by 10.80.175.165 with SMTP id h34mr24897325edd.292.1507043034075; Tue, 03 Oct 2017 08:03:54 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from rpluim-ubuntu ([149.5.228.1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e29sm13384932edd.28.2017.10.03.08.03.49 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 03 Oct 2017 08:03:51 -0700 (PDT) Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes In-Reply-To: <83poa41erm.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 03 Oct 2017 17:34:37 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:137833 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Robert Pluim >> Cc: Eli Zaretskii , jwiegley@gmail.com, 28597@debbugs.gnu.org, nljlistbox2@gmail.com >> Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2017 10:09:15 +0200 >> >> I'm not wedded to the form, but I think configure should output >> *something* to warn people about the change in behaviour. Or we go >> full radical and disable building our own mailutils on non MS-Windows, >> thus simplifying this mess greatly (we'd have to warn a bit more >> loudly if GNU Mailutils aren't installed, though) > > Not building movemail if Mailutils are not installed is too harsh, > because movemail supports methods other than POP3. Does GNU Mailutils not support those same methods? I'm assuming it's also maintained more than our movemail. Robert