From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#31376: 26.0.50; print-charset-text-property not honored Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 19:37:29 -0400 Message-ID: <87d0xwjxs6.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87d0y7ew2h.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <87603zmxna.fsf@gmail.com> <83mux6nws8.fsf@gnu.org> <837eoani9b.fsf@gnu.org> <871seglk1y.fsf@gmail.com> <83r2mflgkh.fsf@gnu.org> <87r2mfjtnd.fsf@gmail.com> <83lgcnl789.fsf@gnu.org> <87o9hjjqb9.fsf@gmail.com> <837eo6kxg3.fsf@gnu.org> <87lgclkewd.fsf@gmail.com> <83vabokf9v.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1526427370 17035 195.159.176.226 (15 May 2018 23:36:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 23:36:10 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) Cc: 31376@debbugs.gnu.org, schwab@linux-m68k.org, eller.helmut@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 16 01:36:05 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fIjU8-0004EY-T2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 May 2018 01:36:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39947 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fIjWG-00027o-0E for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 May 2018 19:38:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57516) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fIjW8-00027i-U8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 May 2018 19:38:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fIjW6-0000zy-A7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 May 2018 19:38:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:56441) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fIjW6-0000zs-6T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 May 2018 19:38:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fIjW5-0007Ws-Qw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 May 2018 19:38:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 23:38:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 31376 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 31376-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B31376.152642746028916 (code B ref 31376); Tue, 15 May 2018 23:38:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 31376) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 May 2018 23:37:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36105 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fIjVk-0007WK-B7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 May 2018 19:37:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-it0-f47.google.com ([209.85.214.47]:50887) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fIjVi-0007W8-FR for 31376@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 May 2018 19:37:39 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-it0-f47.google.com with SMTP id p3-v6so6031530itc.0 for <31376@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 15 May 2018 16:37:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=4Smgm7BBCaRMPSkzIw8D4v0gzksUUimvnHWliOuDldo=; b=cqCEvnVIHs2AIk1vonZ6/IC7oDHBIjf4dwlkTjWpDd4gvO2EgrrSisT9+DdWdI0v4R c7N8GTh1UkJgp4nQObsDt9+wxZgHWVJpwQn2Xuza/BHUt6HSqy1ZcxMUm4b/sIwLKz1F feqUYzKTvCUYAwUAmnQJ877d+LsGEOz8Az149aMr+SYfRx4790/eGP/KrUcgrjFkE1H+ DaZQY1WmrVIRRBz+dDaYAAg7NnCPl1xhDGvH7EwAeDFnF3MlXj6yQFyUKHIjvar9ALG2 mYOZ9/SCqCpo3V+ZW6bzWHky+V+UaVeU1qjho2/aebNrXyrByDewAGduE6P2QNH909e2 XCPA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=4Smgm7BBCaRMPSkzIw8D4v0gzksUUimvnHWliOuDldo=; b=LNLgAkVsc+xeMhJD2QBEBgRL1ZK/PEpPqcv8z/85+qFDqABVJ+v9idUAb9MSYb9K0p n/HDClx7TOxARww+09BoV/SYJ9JbQ8XPflHOea2HEdkNg6XS5ja1K8jj+YWNPqIdM5rJ qRGVyQfi0l+tLi6i8cInYlkv2JkNvQq1+oTudqfKpDOte/2fujTPzu8BI7H2Wghr7sWn 7wyyU1bu0qrAP52utor7beb6pmeLH2pp1qdYLDL3YhUoUEXQTE3vv1sATAYnEgzFoYFM vHzOqt/mkP2fHiE1QnwyPTJGZJp0lipr9UGlPA89jTMMrrdBwdAxpICDfNZ5OSX/Hv8g VGqA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwcJUh3langfjC6jLvRPSt3Zpn4YrTZN7iy1ZXMXZzDeWbCRXSi4 FiW5MLlyD3dBTT46Pr1Qaro= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZpq34G5z4uriKtlHtxjJq21REvQ52hJLDWTQVbXnmeikDHXpfOe5TnHBGpGXeWG534u/12CPQ== X-Received: by 2002:a24:2b12:: with SMTP id h18-v6mr30221ita.141.1526427452668; Tue, 15 May 2018 16:37:32 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from zebian (cbl-45-2-119-34.yyz.frontiernetworks.ca. [45.2.119.34]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id d8-v6sm614259ioh.20.2018.05.15.16.37.29 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 15 May 2018 16:37:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83vabokf9v.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 15 May 2018 20:19:40 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:146207 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> The idea is to take the first if it's not eq to what char-charset >> returns, or the second otherwise (on the assumption that it's different >> from the first). Perhaps clearer if I use cl-find: >> > Maybe I'm missing something, but the negation of the test seemed to be > missing from the original code. But it was a hard day, so maybe my > mind is foggy... Oh, you're right, it was missing. I didn't notice because both the first two elements of charset-list were different from (char-charset ?\0xf6) which let the test pass regardless.