From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#35507: Gnus mojibakifies UTF-8 text/x-patch attachments from Thunderbird Date: Wed, 01 May 2019 23:07:32 -0400 Message-ID: <87d0l1o8p7.fsf@gmail.com> References: <44a26585-7980-378c-9262-a567ddd3e617@cs.ucla.edu> <865zqv3tc2.fsf@gmail.com> <838svqqdp2.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="164775"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) Cc: 35507@debbugs.gnu.org, Andy Moreton To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 02 05:08:15 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hM251-000git-7l for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 May 2019 05:08:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44316 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hM250-0007oM-13 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 May 2019 23:08:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:60149) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hM24r-0007m2-EY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 May 2019 23:08:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hM24q-0008RJ-8I for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 May 2019 23:08:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60031) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hM24o-0008Qq-9Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 May 2019 23:08:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hM24n-0001DV-RR; Wed, 01 May 2019 23:08:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Thu, 02 May 2019 03:08:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 35507 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus Original-Received: via spool by 35507-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B35507.15567664634653 (code B ref 35507); Thu, 02 May 2019 03:08:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 35507) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 May 2019 03:07:43 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45341 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hM24V-0001Cz-DU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 May 2019 23:07:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qk1-f170.google.com ([209.85.222.170]:44933) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hM24T-0001Ck-2B for 35507@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 May 2019 23:07:41 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-qk1-f170.google.com with SMTP id d14so605981qkl.11 for <35507@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 01 May 2019 20:07:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=NbpCUl5BBocwTCmkEKdL/Nr+Jj2GYffdXt6Esn0MydE=; b=JqChzXQE5PA8lDlNUmmN+PaPLqexl7JA8ngJx/ZCdxBzCi0up5TunhLW/a0hFWnYvf w2NWw+5Pjpbx2mPGfUCYLT6dGrG+yBjqeZGqP9/RdOuUQJn9ifiwNXUlUalz9BF+CyGy LWwIEd6/6+ySpk5ljc5lGV0M7gCpPFj0PRHcC3BOT5UYt8IidyfcJu/lbOG6Jw7rYYzc v0KxgyqRmmo0nL03YhCqFpDWrd5iHTKEWOL3Qs6XbDa1dbVcczTpKvQvNEndRyAaZ2PR aevdPu+RIT6F3+RFKReZmIzieuC4OAjGEj2WHYUlfI1gkq+DFbiP9fObkXrG5iQyBTM9 j3dA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=NbpCUl5BBocwTCmkEKdL/Nr+Jj2GYffdXt6Esn0MydE=; b=pAPv2E6NyNDqqDfW4fewMmrMlirWWwIdT1G09FGbBjRLag8OewJqer2QkehiHzSN6N KRgutqhsWxMAKhZBKbF3WlfJwJiuHAqEmmyZRn5JYz7nsLIBp5R/XU/iJsuprSCdY0tC H7f9bzv5sgxMp3Wy/9ab3reQw3d+WU5WkqHZmuAUr6yDHUUw+hY5DilDy3fnz5OBtuxc 3AgJTO0IaHt82ZzVJ/+y0rLuEL2IXOBgFAOLK3qcRuq+yNAXPPpOL1vwlDGSxI8lt6Jo 7plL6xLy+HziAxlk4AQrqaZvhYvMUS93fSXGI5Ur0wWBhOzxYuDeTJSZaHEeZ3ZDatPS S0Fg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUJX9PZ9BVbyxwJmw4zXLsekO4h/gR5dTIqVHagGI6Ycv4X0hYR 0bhycrYiVa+Bcq6xc3rrfuDm01S1 X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzBV3gSNNblwWMxQ4b1UUAgXGYZjrbCG0EhU4V4fZkrZf8RoS3kRqFGwH13Q0UjZ+IwQlMMbw== X-Received: by 2002:a37:4c7:: with SMTP id 190mr1193632qke.128.1556766455311; Wed, 01 May 2019 20:07:35 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from minid (cbl-45-2-119-34.yyz.frontiernetworks.ca. [45.2.119.34]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id m46sm2455187qta.0.2019.05.01.20.07.33 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 01 May 2019 20:07:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <838svqqdp2.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 01 May 2019 20:36:41 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:158615 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Andy Moreton >> Date: Wed, 01 May 2019 17:42:18 +0100 >> >> + (mm-decode-string text 'utf-8)))) > > As I said, I'm not sure we should do this, let alone unconditionally > force UTF-8 here, but if we must, why not use decode-coding-string? > Do we really need the mm-* stuff? As far as I can tell, the mm-* version is useful for handling stuff lke "UTF-8" as the charset argument (which might be useful if we extract it from the "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8" header). If passing 'utf-8, then it's just the same as calling decode-coding-string. For a default if we don't find a charset header, I guess `undecided' would make more sense, right? After all, Emacs already has the coding detection machinery, may as well use it.