From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Federico Tedin Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#38317: Buffer-local variables don't work as history for read-from-minibuffer Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 22:04:31 +0100 Message-ID: <87d0ddvxnk.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87eey0lxxm.fsf@gmail.com> <87v9rcqbls.fsf@gnus.org> <5a0c68d0-4d25-bf8d-fbe8-f106b0f92210@gmx.at> <875zjareo1.fsf@gnus.org> <874kyu72kl.fsf@gmail.com> <87wobq5gs0.fsf@gmail.com> <87o8wyl2wa.fsf@gmail.com> <87k17lfscs.fsf@gnus.org> <87h82pw3vr.fsf@gmail.com> <83y2w1p1f7.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="10488"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 38317@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 27 22:05:14 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ia4Us-0002VP-Fw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 22:05:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43168 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ia4Ur-0006YG-9N for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 16:05:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37637) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ia4Uh-0006Y8-7X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 16:05:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ia4Ug-0005hA-5z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 16:05:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:50299) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ia4Uf-0005gQ-Uc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 16:05:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ia4Uf-0006sI-M9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 16:05:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Federico Tedin Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 21:05:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 38317 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 38317-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B38317.157488868126391 (code B ref 38317); Wed, 27 Nov 2019 21:05:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 38317) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Nov 2019 21:04:41 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56272 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ia4UL-0006rb-8S for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 16:04:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-f42.google.com ([209.85.221.42]:42197) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ia4UJ-0006rO-M7 for 38317@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 16:04:40 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-f42.google.com with SMTP id a15so28404523wrf.9 for <38317@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 13:04:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=vNh3abtuhWwHzmHXc+OFK4fnE9cL/VGTIbhOa1Zq2RY=; b=eOxSY44PqJH3Fpox4Td25eYKB/yQ3k92T3RVmDufknhQGJ0FTwDHxLZHms3CXKFikA O4J0hVTgiVbPPsrcPIfLdC5NrZoNAVVBKg8AfgWVoAVYbKXaY1vnC9GXxSABxukkdPV6 pMpfjo/7YVYEOD2pz4F7E7xN8GB5TnDAIUs7uCzCt7g9AHD1TxRX/SLeoEbuvXdcxDnY F3NewBpZStDqgmanvwzrwy8gnaDDIj1JWp6wkyr317P8ZPMTEMp8g4WZJhzPM0Bgs7zy TCwOd0R6sM33pROiwdgzIi72h4a/1AUXrdU/y8dpMsByQ9By2CncbJMk2gh7XqfKV4J2 oe9w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=vNh3abtuhWwHzmHXc+OFK4fnE9cL/VGTIbhOa1Zq2RY=; b=QzXCQCcyjVD0utQ+WvbTEjPOK7wMQtZZWBkG+vVN+FPzac1mjdtAhPbADQx3DNorb4 FdlhOrHUSZ3avERRSjgJFy8AJnRnqApcqrtDO+CEsSP9C3PgNAyHxXL0QkTmoFbhM4YO FH8ngnMdEHIxnjbO7hDjkwLVrZ+IyQFxQ4ql3kLyG6u1/9eXkRYYmuPEeKwBF18m1P0N RoVbsDrDP3gjJw46EECjlFIcMY48mCzeoGe5FEJI5M7YDhfKjAz4GKxn42vcL2LAn/Lz OEGOL/QwqX1oWk597qVsNp8gozIETah+Wl0uzMl+++/3pT9W+4+jmv/Z+vnxZ1dYE3JK 2XRg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUWL0Tyj/IsWgDhQVaIdFK/SPcu+CinBOkEiIoMAWFcaxaJpgoL NFlrgKY2yyRjoicDF67lVm2FUz/YSpY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwOPrHTyieYq6rypoZEh/SgZkaUcDBQqiiAKwsMhnnJNCatCAz6n5LMXpZkZ6ex8xey4ftjxg== X-Received: by 2002:adf:e2c1:: with SMTP id d1mr33366687wrj.130.1574888673419; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 13:04:33 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from lead ([2a02:8109:8ac0:2ff0:918e:a083:2c78:74e5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n10sm2007251wrt.14.2019.11.27.13.04.31 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 27 Nov 2019 13:04:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83y2w1p1f7.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 27 Nov 2019 21:25:00 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:172557 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > That section does mention the history variables, and even includes a > list of them. So I'm not sure why you say it doesn't. You're right, I was looking at the Emacs manual instead of the Elisp manual (the sections have the same title). I can see that the Elisp manual is more specific about the history list variable. I could mention the possibility of using a buffer-local variable there. > That it adds to the history is worth mentioning, but the fact that it > can be buffer-local we don't normally say explicitly, because it's > expected to "just work". Ok, thanks.