From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ihor Radchenko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#38497: 27.0.50; Frame is not rendered when frame-resize-pixelwise it 't Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2019 17:55:16 +0800 Message-ID: <87d0cxbz7f.fsf@yantar92-laptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> References: <87wobbjlm0.fsf@yantar92-laptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <7caf72bb-1dc0-6e6d-430a-5c28295fb80c@gmx.at> <87tv6fjco6.fsf@yantar92-laptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <20b3b02b-8018-49cd-4ab3-702ccf9e1c28@gmx.at> <87d0d0i7hk.fsf@yantar92-laptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <25861c90-bdb5-e873-7da7-22a8d997f4b6@gmx.at> <87muc3bf9q.fsf@yantar92-laptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <15ff2306-02dd-ea0c-d5e0-ccc6de865c22@gmx.at> <87k177b2b1.fsf@yantar92-laptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <90bb3c33-e824-b39d-cca7-0e162abaf6e0@gmx.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="169041"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" To: martin rudalics , 38497@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 09 10:58:12 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ieFnw-000hqT-Fu for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Dec 2019 10:58:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38002 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ieFnu-0006Ep-S6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Dec 2019 04:58:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50084) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ieFno-0006DT-Qb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Dec 2019 04:58:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ieFnm-0006ro-Om for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Dec 2019 04:58:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:46634) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ieFnm-0006r3-JG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Dec 2019 04:58:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ieFnm-0001dz-Gj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Dec 2019 04:58:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Ihor Radchenko Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2019 09:58:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 38497 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 38497-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B38497.15758854376031 (code B ref 38497); Mon, 09 Dec 2019 09:58:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 38497) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Dec 2019 09:57:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52607 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ieFn3-0001ZD-Ec for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Dec 2019 04:57:17 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-f52.google.com ([209.85.128.52]:40195) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ieFn1-0001Z0-Ls for 38497@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Dec 2019 04:57:16 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-f52.google.com with SMTP id t14so14171511wmi.5 for <38497@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 09 Dec 2019 01:57:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=7SmJpE8CZD0ZM34BOIJJDwZIBoJCtZWVZW829L2s32A=; b=aHckTZOms5uX3UQvevRuH8EbRImCu59vqVeOrI5QtEiVCBlhBVCfWNW/HFAVGK4KDx rJZCl0BTUfG184qlGqJSuyXoEF4oJX8PlwNC6Fbmmrbp1jY9KsxygdBo4zDWUPxyzgls MHXtMvcHc3Px6pAkdY5J7Z0FyhB2fPBY1TXrAB4fu4P54ljQegDFpWyKX5bYHAgdjkGp jXk2aPsXo7Pjk8/Bl0eB4txR47Ha15kByCY2zNbG6As9V7Q7+33WwK1bxAtCXy50D7oR RIn8UC/w3E9iZzYZOa+Si3nlyBq8R5lAtDAVcEuNaJfpuznFpp0eQKjmDBXPecKyXuC0 VsJQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=7SmJpE8CZD0ZM34BOIJJDwZIBoJCtZWVZW829L2s32A=; b=JORB8d0+3HRnb3Mg0UekkhKbiGBIvAtKTT1O6Rb7wOwq1wgPwyXSkM6hNc1ImUoUHO KeBmvFQBNHphTe7uBAvEz6XHfr/rhS9nAJ0Zjmg5Qawta13EQGZ5K4hWQ78BbZh06sSf oXLcjqwXh3uDOk4dvnTWBOYDhSMnsv76DRAkEefSOuTCk31fh3GlRTzcI3vkWVFzQNpf OQxZFN/3Vps63JEM47Zwzrsjv9hXKE8F+p8vJ4UpH3J4m50feL9PxPSrCc6QIfJ5OKXD QgxcZLcFU6Iaxvm2xr/kdIXgEFplkUdgnCObMfM57Xa+1cqnx6AtKVG7yZ6/kjKf87JB ozBA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUoLpX/x906y0oSVcjhZUJ0IERhejo91duMXxjBY8AHPfVewXbt 0lcTsq7/Jp+OXcMWtz+w9/c= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzeuV7fdc8sDoVoPPpSmRW/zSWy7hrUTlfOmnH4pJnD5F0tPW4zub+1BxltEiDdlt1qMUVJrw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:10cd:: with SMTP id l13mr25016741wmd.102.1575885429638; Mon, 09 Dec 2019 01:57:09 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from localhost ([5.226.137.4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s16sm26891635wrn.78.2019.12.09.01.57.07 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 09 Dec 2019 01:57:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <90bb3c33-e824-b39d-cca7-0e162abaf6e0@gmx.at> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:173091 Archived-At: > Having a tiled layout, do you need to set 'frame-resize-pixelwise' to > t at all? I thought a tiling WM would ignore size hints anyway. In my WM (Awesome WM), I always see a small gap below the maximised emacs frame. The gap disappears when I set 'frame-resize-pixelwise' to 't. > This seems typical of applying a frame character size based > maximization first and a pixelwise maximization afterwards. Does it > fully maximize immediately when you build Emacs with the default > configuration or do you see such an intermediate frame size too? The intermediate frame size seems to be the way Awesome WM handles newly created windows. First, the window is being created without respecting the tiling layout. Then, the window seems to be resized according to layout. Best, Ihor martin rudalics writes: > > The default emacs frame is just around a quarter of screen size (as it > > appears in floating window layout) and I can sometimes see it appearing > > for a split second in a tile layout before being resized. > > Having a tiled layout, do you need to set 'frame-resize-pixelwise' to > t at all? I thought a tiling WM would ignore size hints anyway. > > > Also, as I showed in emacs -Q recipe, failure to redraw the frame > > can also be triggered in a maximised or a full screen emacs frame. The > > frame is also being resized there, though it is much less noticeable > > (just closing small gap below the maximised frame). > > This seems typical of applying a frame character size based > maximization first and a pixelwise maximization afterwards. Does it > fully maximize immediately when you build Emacs with the default > configuration or do you see such an intermediate frame size too? > > martin