From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#39347: 28.0.50; iso8601-parse can't handle all legal date values? Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 00:28:18 +0100 Message-ID: <87d0b1yh9p.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87blqmugec.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87lfppyj1i.fsf@gnus.org> <87h80dsv7g.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="39505"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 39347@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eric Abrahamsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 30 00:29:17 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iwwln-000ADX-Vx for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 00:29:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52960 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iwwlm-00016U-RR for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 18:29:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36089) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iwwlb-00016O-AV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 18:29:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iwwla-00071K-6n for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 18:29:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:56964) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iwwla-00070v-3i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 18:29:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iwwla-0003PN-0D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 18:29:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 23:29:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39347 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 39347-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39347.158034050813054 (code B ref 39347); Wed, 29 Jan 2020 23:29:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 39347) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jan 2020 23:28:28 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34704 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iwwl2-0003OU-6z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 18:28:28 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:50712) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iwwl1-0003OG-H5 for 39347@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 18:28:27 -0500 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iwwks-0003fc-SF; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 00:28:21 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87h80dsv7g.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> (Eric Abrahamsen's message of "Wed, 29 Jan 2020 15:23:47 -0800") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:175417 Archived-At: Eric Abrahamsen writes: > I sure hope so! Anyway, looks like the library is correct, and I just > get to decide if I want to support deprecated forms that might be sent > by someone's random outdated carddav server. Bleagh. I think we could extend the library to handle those forms -- if they aren't ambiguous. (I seem to vaguely remember that there were some forms that were ambiguous when shortened, but I don't remember the details.) Do you have a pointer to the 2000 version of the ISO8601 standard? I could have a peek. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no