From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Benjamin Riefenstahl Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17957: 24.3.92; Bad interaction between "emacs --daemon" and "desktop-save-mode" Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2021 15:52:53 +0200 Message-ID: <87czrhgi8a.fsf@turtle-trading.net> References: <87y2a9l05f.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="15677"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) Cc: Glenn Morris , 17957@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 17 15:54:10 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m4kle-0003ra-0v for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 17 Jul 2021 15:54:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35740 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m4klc-0005wo-QD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 17 Jul 2021 09:54:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59124) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m4klW-0005wg-J2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Jul 2021 09:54:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:41468) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m4klW-0007tA-BK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Jul 2021 09:54:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m4klW-00013u-5e for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Jul 2021 09:54:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Benjamin Riefenstahl Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2021 13:54:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17957 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 17957-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17957.16265299864016 (code B ref 17957); Sat, 17 Jul 2021 13:54:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17957) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Jul 2021 13:53:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53014 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m4kkc-00012i-Hm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Jul 2021 09:53:06 -0400 Original-Received: from odoacer.turtle-trading.net ([93.241.193.16]:53034) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m4kka-00012D-KM for 17957@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Jul 2021 09:53:05 -0400 Original-Received: from zenobia.turtle-trading.net ([192.168.2.109]) by odoacer.turtle-trading.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1m4kkP-0005F3-OK; Sat, 17 Jul 2021 15:52:53 +0200 Original-Received: from benny by zenobia.turtle-trading.net with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m4kkP-0007i6-Nj; Sat, 17 Jul 2021 15:52:53 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87y2a9l05f.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Wed, 14 Jul 2021 11:23:08 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:210126 Archived-At: Hi Lars, > Benjamin Riefenstahl writes: >> OTOH I still think there is another issue. [...] Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > I tried following the recipe (in Emacs 28), but I was unable to > reproduce the problem. Are you still seeing this issue in more recent > versions of Emacs? The original issue was fixed. I was somehow wondering about a more fundmental problem, but I can not at this time reconstruct what it was or why I thought that the patch was not sufficient for that (I assume we were talking about #c9f7ec736b here). I think we can just close the bug and assume that any other issues have been or will be dealt with when they cause actual problems. Thanks, benny