From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#50572: 28.0.50; [PATCH] fix VC to find the responsible backend with the most specific path. Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 11:46:37 +0100 Message-ID: <87czn7hsvm.fsf@gmx.de> References: <877dfkxyt4.fsf@elite.giraud> <86mtmgx6gg.fsf@gmail.com> <87fe707b-f2b4-febd-d2ae-acc697b4cee1@yandex.ru> <87zgqgjeaz.fsf@gnus.org> <87cznbt2r1.fsf@elite.giraud> <87h7cn803w.fsf@gnus.org> <878rxzszl8.fsf@elite.giraud> <877ddiuhv7.fsf@gnus.org> <87y25x3e6g.fsf@elite.giraud> <87a6icoqkm.fsf@gnus.org> <8856c512-a603-fa3e-bf21-c191a8a45afa@yandex.ru> <87bl2slv3j.fsf@gnus.org> <87y25wkfnb.fsf@gnus.org> <838rxw41dt.fsf@gnu.org> <87h7ckf9oz.fsf@gnus.org> <83sfw42ipa.fsf@gnu.org> <87zgqbe6xu.fsf@gnus.org> <83y25v189s.fsf@gnu.org> <87h7cji179.fsf@gmx.de> <83sfw315kg.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37017"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 50572@debbugs.gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org, andrewjmoreton@gmail.com, manuel@ledu-giraud.fr, dgutov@yandex.ru To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 11 11:47:23 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ml7c3-0009Qs-M4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 11:47:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59216 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ml7c2-0003GP-Ip for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 05:47:22 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:46484) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ml7bj-0003Dq-SV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 05:47:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:56934) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ml7bi-0007AK-G7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 05:47:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ml7bi-00055B-9G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 05:47:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Albinus Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 10:47:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50572 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 50572-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B50572.163662761119515 (code B ref 50572); Thu, 11 Nov 2021 10:47:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 50572) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Nov 2021 10:46:51 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40247 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ml7bW-00054h-TT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 05:46:51 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:56721) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ml7bU-00054S-Bo for 50572@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 05:46:48 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1636627600; bh=I705dTIUJdvEG73Z4lnK/AdeojYISub8GFVi1G7hGOU=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=Z7YNvktOxe8glVO0KfzlNTaKuWKNtAE2jMGHbMyVe4YtVoz50axJ6yB+ZGmlgX2LM i60ZuCFUqR/Aqk1Jy/aPerx/2PHVSSFno8X59SkryfTyyMW8FGIY5VovmioTVxqRrU qJM/WdukCXen+OmGS0FAHCxGOAri7qI5gc93n3t0= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from gandalf.gmx.de ([213.220.159.17]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx104 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MybKf-1mUgBB15eX-00yxRQ; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 11:46:40 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83sfw315kg.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 11 Nov 2021 10:04:31 +0200") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:U20PcVfbs4wjbNMELWnUSfyWsejC+yDcq+RPwhv+Ylq3ldU1zQl rifzZyPIFy5Q02QIKarP+7BP2JzQNiV/Slp1CqeRnsrXpH6mLVJyVfjHA4FNRBBHaudFJbH zuuWIfSf6rsOxNAz4IvJ0n2gfg43rLbIBPg8gaKj/aoFmnl0wcUpL/L/DMaJpekSdTap/JX 2iNiyyk3aD1eNI9xzSJNg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:9Aq6C1p4hZg=:1i0eGvd2ZKsIGtSasGgC87 2Izvmv0Wqb7ubEkNQux1PciCd4yU/xN+5Dmv9IyqOuF6zuw/vBzBndkqq8Moxf1NzHRkRRtN2 O4v01vzkkBXzD8vVnBjAGzN7VIxwN9kltHaY3OPoRYXKuh2V5fCDB/qU6JZw13Z1AdOJBgtO5 Q3ityl9VU0u3cn0LPuGRhI8aN7AOvrnHNoNb84szWFZ8ykx7PZfTQfj/we86Aflm7GmYowleU bC2XwlkPSsqZNr9qMe4tHNevMtEuDRxuCUyjYTcGsRuAi3N0f3v47VmiZR9uDs5iFftFiQIsf Kqf3ZPEwNPY2B7+V9ipoW4iZjhYCnyPr4P2z2MGk4RhAXl/6aWIDgTOXlowsaHD2CxY+A17Ka aogOagwelUG81U14UHmliogU0pSFAaQWaWEfjqHQSgZurcj9D04mltVz1P1d4VoXUfHzf/D3t p2H/Yq6puraXxuzX1JyX80vEBFsXwnvd+sM/cvPtGm5jBQwqq2rD3rK3s6/qJRcA5pks5s5sw AZ5UBA92JwMHf/uwHdQmaHdhGlJ3RD/EM7Unyp663v4i/05RgeskAIzs3Tyfael8YacNKuCTE huFlGQjxb2R8YzdV1aHBjQHC/JFNOCHxJvHOQaKecuvXr1nezPn8cqh4yp5bHR6TXEufTiCS5 DwLdO9GpYqUrXIP9U5Ioz72134QTkQVM8HKRkbSv/sSxySfbEGuLqMbCDBv8Y5u8ylZiYDlJT I7uPYPkG/e2Ok08tC/i7Z/lCQKgAjGnP22oIKE+0eZhLBGvXVT0FbbpV6sgoXuFxdQTzs15F X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:219619 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: Hi Eli, >> >> If so, then yes. What would be the test to identify the systems >> >> where this is the case? >> > >> > (memq system-type '(windows-nt ms-dos)) >> >> This doesn't recognize remote file names. > > The issue was about backslashes being directory separators, I believe? > If so, what does that have to do with remote file names? Remote file names do not use "\\" as directory separator, that's all what I want to say. I don't know whether this is relevant for the intended bug fix; I didn't follow the discussion completely. Best regards, Michael.